Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which franchises are known as the most well run?


Panthero
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Panthero said:

Not just have some rockstar qb carrying them. Just curious as to which teams just consistently bop along no matter what. Also, do you think it's because the owners stay the hell out of the way or that some actually get it and there just aren't many that do? 

Carolina Hurricanes.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers are numero uno from what I've been listening to on sports radio. 

Patriots

Ravens

Packers

Other organizations are doing a good job like the Chiefs as 49ers. It helps when you have a great QB. 

Standing the rest of time through multiple QBs and still winning is a good barometer. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually, look to find this answer in the draft.  How they draft is the first step.  I do not know a franchise that is well run that does not draft very well.  We once had a draft (2001) that carried our franchise to a Super Bowl (38)--Morgan, Jenkins, and Steve Sr.  We have not come close to that since. 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Baltimore has the best case for most well run organization over the last 25 years personally. 

San Francisco recently in the last five years. 

New England had the greatest individual run anyone will ever have but they have really regressed post Brady 

All time in the NFL is probably Pittsburgh 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...