Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Head Coach Preference as of January 12th


Evil Hurney
 Share

Head Coach Preference as of January 12th  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. Which head coaching option do you most prefer?

    • former Titans HC, Mike Vrabel
    • Bengals OC, Brian Callahan
    • Buccaneers OC, Dave Canales
    • Ravens OC, Todd Monken
    • Dolphins OC, Frank Smith
    • Panthers DC, Ejiro Evero
    • Ravens DC, Mike Macdonald
    • Other (leave name in comments)

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/15/2024 at 05:59 AM

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Vrabel, although I think that he may be good in theory, is 54-45. I don't know that he's the best option.

How do y'all know he isn't just going to be another Rivera or Fox?

If you look over the talent, he fought way above his weight class. Thats a rare trait these days. 

I mean Id non-stop run the ball with a prime henry too, could not care less what the insighters/podcasters said. 

Both Ive cooled on him, still want that young offense leadership. I guess frank smith is the pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

How can you exclude Harbaugh? C'mon', man.

He wasn't. I had him going to the Chargers (the team he's been most linked to).

IF Harbaugh stays at Michigan, I could see Vrabel being the consolation prize for the Chargers.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I feel Ben Jonson won't be attainable, I'll go with Frank Smith

 

Helped turn around a culture around in Miami as part of a record setting NFL offensive staff. He's also part of that McVay, Shanahan, Mcdaniel tree and I wants me some of that. Comes off a a leader and just read a poll that he was voted the most liked coordinator in the NFL as a cherry on top

 

And before any says he didn't call plays, neither did McDaniel in San Fran

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, nobody really excites me. I'm sure some of those guys would be good...maybe even great.

I just don't see us having any success for a while now matter who we get and, knowing our track record, the bar is set high for mediocre.

And I know if 8 let myself get excited about someone, they've been a disappointment.

So I'm just along for the ride. If we win, great. If we don't....well I'm used to it.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jahdae Barron. Bringing plus physicality at a position where it’s normally scarce is an impactful swing. He’s going to help the character of whatever defense he’s on. I’d prefer a d-lineman, but there likely isn’t one worth 8, and there are so many in the middle rounds. Just get a dude who helps.
    • You got me on the April Fool Joke. 🙂
    • 1.  Edge Jalon Walker:  I have been skeptical of Walker's fit as I would be any hybrid type of player, but his strengths as a person and player and the flexibility he gives the DC is formidable. He gives us a LB who can covert to Edge or Edge who can convert to LB during "hurry up" offenses when you can't substitute.  Walker scares me, but you don't draft him if you can't see the fit.  At #8, we could do worse.  I am seeing more Micah Parsons than I did a week ago.  2.  CB Will Johnson: Too often we think of the third CB as depth or nickel because that is traditional thought.  In today's NFL, it is common to have 3 CBs on the field since the NFL has gone to 11 personnel --3 WRs, 1 TE--65% of the time, up from 55% in 2010; and if we have an injury to Horn or Jackson, there is not a lot we can do).  With Johnson and Horn on the outside and Jackson on the third WR, our secondary is solid, preventing us from having to cover the third WR with a S, who would be assigned to TEs instead. 3.  TE Tyler Warren:   The only way I take Warren is if I plan to use him as a multi-dimensional offensive weapon.   He would give the Panthers an elite TE (when we have been good, we have had an elite TE and an elite ILB) and lessen the need to reach for a WR by giving Young a shiny new weapon.  There are a lot of teams who like Warren, so if he is still on the board, watch a team like the Rams try to trade up.  With Sanders as an option in a 2 TE set and depth, we would have a pretty good TE room. Chris Simms recently said Warren would be better than Brock Bowers.   Well.... In five years:  Warren finished his five-year college career with 1,839 yards, 153 receptions and 25 total touchdowns.  In three years:  Bowers in three years at Georgia finished with 2,538 yards, 175 receptions and 31 total touchdowns.
×
×
  • Create New...