Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Evil Hurney said:

Not the worst outcome. Callahan's stock is a bit depressed since the Bengals missed the playoffs. Otherwise he checks a lot of the boxes: multi-year OC, young, history developing a young QB.

 

And Joe Burrow as a QB. We don’t have Joe Burrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, philit99 said:

And Joe Burrow as a QB. We don’t have Joe Burrow

And the other issue.

Their HC is the play caller.  And their HC was the one everyone was giving credit for the QB and the offense just 2 years ago.

 

This feels very Reichish.  An OC who never called plays.  But point to his work with a backup QB for a few games.  Callahan is essentially what Reich was leaving Philly 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ncfan said:

And the other issue.

Their HC is the play caller.  And their HC was the one everyone was giving credit for the QB and the offense just 2 years ago.

 

This feels very Reichish.  An OC who never called plays.  But point to his work with a backup QB for a few games.  Callahan is essentially what Reich was leaving Philly 

Is he, didn’t know that as the bengals games I saw this year, Callahan had the call sheet and sending in plays 

who knows 

let’s face it, not many want to work for Tepper, with a zero sum game of talent, no first rd pick and Young at qb 

It’s a pipe drum to expect much more 

on the other hand, all the names where ‘no names’ at one time 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Is he, didn’t know that as the bengals games I saw this year, Callahan had the call sheet and sending in plays 

who knows 

let’s face it, not many want to work for Tepper, with a zero sum game of talent, no first rd pick and Young at qb 

It’s a pipe drum to expect much more 

on the other hand, all the names where ‘no names’ at one time 

Taylor is the play caller.

http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Why-the-Bengals-are-December-Dominators?pid=1440316#pid1440316

Taylor is also the one everyone was crediting his work with Burrow 2 years ago.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Taylor is the play caller.

http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Why-the-Bengals-are-December-Dominators?pid=1440316#pid1440316

Taylor is also the one everyone was crediting his work with Burrow 2 years ago.  

Whether they do or don’t call plays doesn’t equate to how successful they will be as an offensive HC. 
McVay, McDaniel, Taylor (was QB coach) and O’Connel to name a few weren’t primary play callers before getting HC gigs. 
Basing preference off of wether or not they called plays but then referencing coaches who previously weren’t primary playcallers is kind of backwards. 
This isn’t a vouch for Callahan, just an observation 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Do you guys think the list we have out now is all we will interview, or will there be more in the coming days? 

I think the list is big enough as it is. Don't know that we really need to add anybody else.

Hell, I'd have probably preferred a smaller list.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, I have three tiers and would be happy with any of the candidates. I'd prefer Tier 1, but I am not getting my hopes up. I want the next hire to have three things....

1 - A plan for Bryce. He doesn't have to be specifically brought in as a "Bryce Whisperer", but Young is our franchise QB and has untapped talent that was not 

2 - A common vision/alignment with our new GM to build the culture and personnel the right way. I don't care if they are OC or DC, just get this team back on track from top to bottom.

3 - Who is he bringing with him? This can be everything from coordinators to potential players and connections around the league. For example, would having Callahan be the connection that decides on where Higgins goes in FA? Could we land Jamo Williams with BJ's tie to Detroit? The players matter less, but it definitely helps a francise with poor optics around the league right now.

The Big 3 who I want first and foremost. A clear separation from the other candidates:

  • Harbaugh
  • Johnson
  • Vrabel

The Young Coordinators that are all lumped together for me for differing reasons. Each are ready but could see differing levels of success/failure once they are the man running the show and not strictly calling plays. I really don't think either is necesarily "better" than the other.

  • Evero
  • Slowik
  • Smith
  • Canales
  • MacDonald
  • Monken
  • Callahan

The more "veteran" HCs with experience calling the shots and with SB experience. Both of their last stints didn't end well, but time has passed and shouldn't be held to that forever:

  • Morris
  • Quinn

 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steelo said:

In a digital age where Kellen Moore leads Vegas betting odds as our next HC the rumblings (or lack therefore of)of random people on the net does very little to move me when the only true indicator is a concrete notification that the interview went down. If it doesn’t happen it doesn’t happen, but basing interest on the “reporting” of people with anonymous sources does nothing for me. 

I’m not talking about random people on the net. Falcons beat (who are very much reputable) have been on top of their interest in Harbaugh and Belichick for a while now. And both those interviews wound up happening. Not that our beat reporters have any worth and maybe we’re just that tight lipped but there being no hint whatsoever of any interest in those 2 guys makes it more likely than not that we’re just not considering them. Sure we could hear in an hour that we spoke to Harbaugh this morning. But that’s a much longer shot than if there was some reported interest in him before now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...