Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Coach/GM Updates

ProcessBlue2

By ProcessBlue2,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You claim I'm misquoting something, only to turn around and completely mischaracterize what I've said 🤔

Can you actually quote where I've said analytics shouldn't be used at all?

Hint: I haven't.

What I did say was in response to the suggestion that if we'd engaged in analytics we might not have messed up on Young and others, etc. 

Hence, why I pointed out to our sadly mistaken friend that we did.

Of course we looked at analytics, but we also looked at traditional scouting. Which was the primary driver? 
You keep making absolute statements trying to prove your point and it’s not going well. 
Just because we looked at some analytics driven data doesn’t mean if we had used more that the outcome wouldn’t have been different. 
if anything I would say traditional scouting hurt us more than anything, better use of analytics could have prevented that.  Also better scouting could have. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Of course we looked at analytics, but we also looked at traditional scouting. Which was the primary driver? 
You keep making absolute statements trying to prove your point and it’s not going well. 
Just because we looked at some analytics driven data doesn’t mean if we had used more that the outcome wouldn’t have been different. 
if anything I would say traditional scouting hurt us more than anything, better use of analytics could have prevented that.  Also better scouting could have. 

I'm sure you would say that, but you don't have a single thing to back that up.

Your entire position is basically to disagree with me (which near as I can tell is the only reason you post at all). The problem is you don't seem to have read a single piece of info on the things you claim to know.

Talk to me when you've actually got something to support your claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm sure you would say that, but you don't have a single thing to back that up.

Your entire position is basically to disagree with me (which near as I can tell is the only reason you post at all). The problem is you don't seem to have read a single piece of info on the things you claim to know.

Talk to me when you've actually got something to support your claims.

diverting again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...