Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christmas Day Games


BY9Franchise
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't understand the concept from a viewers POV. Why would I watch someone who is spouting things they clearly don't believe just to get me to bite on being riled up? It doesn't make sense. Why would I watch if it is designed to make me outraged or mad? What is the point of that?

I literally do not understand this concept at all. Billions of people fall for it but for the life of me I cannot understand it.

I hate to be that guy but saying stupid things gets you click and views. It's the new era of social media. Controversy sells. Cam was the talk of the NFL last week for saying Purdy and Dak are game managers. People love that kind of stuff.

 

You're just one of the view who has the mindset to block that nonsense out. It's kind of hard for me because I mainly just watch sports.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't understand the concept from a viewers POV. Why would I watch someone who is spouting things they clearly don't believe just to get me to bite on being riled up? It doesn't make sense. Why would I watch if it is designed to make me outraged or mad? What is the point of that?

I literally do not understand this concept at all. Billions of people fall for it but for the life of me I cannot understand it.

That's been the guarding force behind sports talk radio pretty much since Jim Rome hit the scene.

It's not about having a thoughtful discussion anymore. It's about having the hottest possible take (and having it first) then demanding everybody react to it.

At some point, fandom decided dick measuring contests were more fun than thoughtful discussion.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's been the guarding force behind sports talk radio pretty much since Jim Rome hit the scene.

It's not about having a thoughtful discussion anymore. It's about having the hottest possible take (and having it first) then demanding everybody react to it.

At some point, fandom decided dick measuring contests were more fun than thoughtful discussion.

Yeah, I miss both thoughtful and reasoned sports and political discussion. We have really devolved in those aspects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...