Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Bowl Season


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

If Washington and Penix play anywhere close to what they are doing so far, Michigan has a huge problem on their hands.  Their secondary isn't made to keep up with a team with this much skill and speed.

Is Michigan's d-line top tier?  They will have to pressure and contain Penix.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rocky Davis said:

If Washington and Penix play anywhere close to what they are doing so far, Michigan has a huge problem on their hands.  Their secondary isn't made to keep up with a team with this much skill and speed.

Is Michigan's d-line top tier?  They will have to pressure and contain Penix.

Michigan is very good up front on both sides.  This looks unstoppable though

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I agree that Bama wasn't undeserving, I just think that Oregon and Georgia were better.  This all would be moot if they could have gone ahead and agreed to implement the 12 team playoff this year, but you know $ and wheeling and dealing comes before sanity.

The interesting piece is that the ACC and PAC 12 were two conferences that voted against the 12 team playoff this year. If they had voted for it, PAC 12 would have had two teams in with the ACC at least having FSU in. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

LOL, no block in the back there…nope

Actually refreshing to see them pick it up, that push was after the play was done and didn't affect the outcome.  Following the rule book though it technically WAS a block in the back, but there is no consistency with these refs now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

The interesting piece is that the ACC and PAC 12 were two conferences that voted against the 12 team playoff this year. If they had voted for it, PAC 12 would have had two teams in with the ACC at least having FSU in. 

For both the ACC and PAC 12 it was about the potential revenue split being lower with 12 teams in.  I don't know what the Big 10 was thinking.  Anyways, shortsighted and you're right it did cost both conferences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...