Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we seriously consider Evero for head coach?


PleaseCutStewart
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, SZ James (banned) said:

I do watch the games which is why saying that the defense sucks is fuging insanity

Rather, the defense as a reflection of Evero's coaching, is overachieving & good given the circumstances

Evero is an incredible DC.  Look at what he has done in consecutive seasons in Denver & Carolina with terrible offenses.  

And while personally I don't think this is the worst overall team in history (I think 2010 was the worst talent wise), this team does play the worst complimentary football of any team in franchise history.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be shocked. It would allow Tepper to keep a lot of his staff and probably Tabor too. Then you would only have to rebuild your offensive staff. The question is who do you bring in as OC?

Kellen Moore who could have some trouble finding a HC gig after attaching himself to Staley? 

Somebody like Greg Roman, Bill O'Brien, or Eric Bienemy? Sure you could probably get EB from Ron's fired staff but he ranks 12th in passing and 24th in rushing. If that really an offensive guru?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2023 at 8:40 AM, Khyber53 said:

Y'all realize that our defense isn't very good either, right?

It has been the least stinky turd in the pile, but that doesn't make great.

Let's just move on from everything associated with this season.

Considering how little our offense has done and all the injuries, our defense has done very well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

Considering how little our offense has done and all the injuries, our defense has done very well. 

Like I said, least stinky turd in the pile.

That's not a real Carolina defense. Haven't seen one of those since Luke retired. It used to be our hallmark and should be our standard.

But we may have packed that away with Keep Pounding. Sad how far we've fallen so quickly.

This is a good defense only in comparison to our offense. That's not a high mark on the wall to clear, yanno? Time to restart, yet again, and hope we can get back to our roots.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Like I said, least stinky turd in the pile.

That's not a real Carolina defense. Haven't seen one of those since Luke retired. It used to be our hallmark and should be our standard.

But we may have packed that away with Keep Pounding. Sad how far we've fallen so quickly.

This is a good defense only in comparison to our offense. That's not a high mark on the wall to clear, yanno? Time to restart, yet again, and hope we can get back to our roots.

 

This unit is still transitioning too an odd-front as its' base. He was sifting through guys like Tuttle, Williams and Houston off the scrap heap. 

Let him have a more prominent role in the decision making process as HCs do. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Like I said, least stinky turd in the pile.

That's not a real Carolina defense. Haven't seen one of those since Luke retired. It used to be our hallmark and should be our standard.

But we may have packed that away with Keep Pounding. Sad how far we've fallen so quickly.

This is a good defense only in comparison to our offense. That's not a high mark on the wall to clear, yanno? Time to restart, yet again, and hope we can get back to our roots.

 

I don't think anybody here is arguing that our defense is elite talent wise. What we are arguing is that Evero is somehow making a bottom 10 (possibly bottom 5) talent defense look pretty damn good.

You put Luke, TD, Shaq, prime Norman, and all of the great pass rushers we had on this defense and I'm sure Evero would have them playing as good, if not better, than our best D years of the mid-late 2010s

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he has a legit OC and QB coach ready, why not? Unlike last year, this new HC group is meh for me*. 

Plus do allll the "yea this defense isnt that good" people know that the panthers were 4-3 last year?? Most of the FA funds were used on offense. Ill repeat what others have said about injuries, no horn or shaq for most of the year. Bell, wooods, djack, chinn, burns, ygm, henderson, houston among others have alll missed a few games. 

In the short time, pitty offense, and not much talent. He couldnt do a much better job. If not for the defense I'd stop watching this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...