Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking for some new Sci/Fi or Fantasy novels.


Kurb
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've combed the thread, and didn't see where anyone said this? :confused:

I think he meant like if you go into a book store, it's always Sci-Fi/Fantasty. Instead of its own section.

I just ordered Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion from BN.com yesterday. Hope they turn out to be solid reads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo!

It's more meant as good natured ribbing from one nerd to another than any kind of real bitching.

Ah. Lol.

But this lends itself to another literary question: should they have separate sections? Because by all accounts, they are the same thing, at least according to classification. Or, for accuracy's sake, Science Fiction is the most popular and widely read sub-genre of Fantasy; but it would still be considered Fantasy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Originally posted in the thread that got lost back in Feb. Some stuff not already mentioned. (if it was, I missed it)

Sci-Fi:

-Gordon R Dickson's Dorsai series, bibliography here.

-Fred Saberhagen's Berserker series, bibliography here. <-pure sci-fi, he later wrote some fantasy books, but I never liked them as much as his sci-fi. If you think he's ripping sombebody off, read the copyright dates.

Some others - Roger Zelazny, David Niven edit, meant Larry Niven, not the actor David

Fantasy:

-Steven Erikson's Malazan series, bibliography here. Aquired taste, but worth the struggle. Very chaotic, very dark.

-Patrick Rothfuss's Name of the Wind. This is book 1, book 2 is due soon. Best fantasy book I've read in a long, long time.

-Gail Z. Martin's Necromancer series, bibliography here. Teaches at UNCC btw.

-Misty Massey's Mad Kestrel. This is a bit of pulp novel, but good reading nonetheless. I read it in two sittings. Good storytelling, also a local (NC) girl.

-Fritz Leiber's Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, hard to find, bibliography here

Some others - Robin Hobb (first 6 books only, after that, it's like she forgot how to write), Eric van Lustbader (Sunset Warrior, Dai-San, etc.), Tad Williams' Green Tower.

Of all those, I'm eagerly awaiting the next books from Erikson, Rothfuss and Martin. Started reading Gail Z. by accident. The wife picked it up in error, thinking it was George R. R.

Edited by bryonez
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can say about A Game of Thrones is the first 1/3rd is really boring, but important. Once you get over that hump, its all pure awesome. Not much magic though.

EDIT: Here's a small teaser for the HBO series that doesn't do a whole lot except provide some slick production, but its the first release for the show, which debuts next March: http://www.hbo.com/video/video.html/?autoplay=true&vid=1100909&filter=game-of-thrones&view=null

Edited by Porn Shop Clerk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Glad Inmicus bumped this... I finished Fall of Hyperion about two weeks ago. Great book, couldn't put it down, but was a bit disappointed with the end of the story. I can't decide if I like the change in format between the two books. I think I liked Fall better... but mainly because it had an ending whereas Hyperion was just stopped, almost mid-sentence...

Conceptually it was pretty deep. It's funny to me how much of the imagery (the All Thing and comlogs, etc.) mimics todays tech, most of which Simmons had no clue of, like cell phones and the internet.

I am going to try and get Endymion and keep reading just to see what Simmons saw as the end to all of it... overall I'm glad I read it.

Finally got Endymion and Rise of Endymion read... I enjoyed Hyperion and Fall of Hyperion, but these last two were in my top five all-time books, seriously...

Some of the stuff in the books is... profound. That's the only word I can come up with to describe it. I didn't always like Simmons style of writing, but his concepts and the story was off the charts good.

I would recommend these four books to anyone... I literally couldn't put the two Endymion books down, they consumed my life for the last week and a half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting, I always liked Hyperion and Fall better than the Endymion books.

They're all great though. And I agree about the concepts, that's the thing with sci-fi for me, if it's not challenging you philosophically, it's really not doing its job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You should try "Age of Zeus" by James Lovegrove. Here's a little write-up about it:

"The Olympians appeared a decade ago, living incarnations of the Ancient Greek gods on a mission to bring permanent order and stability to the world. Resistance has proved futile, and now humankind is under the jackboot of divine oppression. Then former London police officer Sam Akehurst receives an invitation too tempting to turn down, the chance to join a small band of geurilla rebels armed with high-tech weapons and battlesuits. Calling themselves the Titans, they square off against the Olympians and their ferocious mythological monsters in a war of attrition which not all of them will survive!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry Brooks - Shannara series is really good

Raymond Feist - Riftwar Saga also is excellent

Tad Williams - Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn is very good (first book is The Dragonbone Chair); also the Otherland series is great

Edited by Woodie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry Brooks - Shannara series is really good

Raymond Feist - Riftwar Saga also is excellent

Tad Williams - Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn is very good (first book is The Dragonbone Chair); also the Otherland series is great

Love Raymond Feist and Tad Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK, so I just finished Ender's Game... it was a good read. Not really what I was expecting honestly and the end seemed a little anti-climactic to me, but whatever... are the follow on books worth the time?

Ender's Shadow is a decent read, it's from Bean's point of view. Idk about the others. I also thought the ending was anticlimactic, but appropriate.

I haven't been reading much sci-fi lately, but I recently read Starship Troopers. It's a decent read and a short one. The futuristic fascist society in the book and the moral philosophy discussed is interesting enough to keep the pages turning.

Edited by Razzy
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...