Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Labor Talks heating up


King Taharqa

Recommended Posts

BillyHunterDavidStern.jpg

DALLAS -- NBA labor negotiations have turned even more contentious earlier than perhaps anybody, including the union, anticipated.

NBA owners met with members of the players' association Friday for the first time since the league submitted a formal proposal to the players on Jan. 29, the result of which was the union saying it forced the league to tear up what union president Derek Fisher said was a non-starter.

Normally, during what is supposed to be the annual festive celebration of the league's prosperity, NBA commissioner David Stern and union executive director Billy Hunter hold a joint news conference. But the union called its own news conference Friday afternoon, pre-empting Stern's State of the League address on Saturday.

Hunter and Fisher essentially said that everything that was included in the owners' proposal was unacceptable.

"After a contentious, 90-minute session, it was agreed that the owners would tear up their proposal," Hunter said. "So that proposal is off the table."

The sides have until June 30, 2011, to come to an agreement before the league is likely to lock out the players. The union told the owners that it would craft its own proposal and submit it to the owners for further discussion.

Hunter said the league would like to get something done before free agency begins on July 1. However, it seems highly unlikely the union will begin to seriously negotiate with the owners until next season because it does not want to handicap what is sure to be a bonanza summer for free agents like LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh and Joe Johnson.

Those players all are likely to be "max" players with contracts that could exceed $100 million. Hunter and his team are not going to intentionally undermine the negotiating power of those players to appease an ownership group that desperately wants to get its cost structure in line.

Neither Hunter nor Fisher would commit to a timeline for a union proposal, further enhancing the notion that these negotiations are not going to turn serious until one side begins to feel pain.

Getting something in place by July 1 "is not going to happen," said Roger Mason, one of the players on the negotiating committee. Hunter said the union would entertain any new proposal submitted by the owners, though they'd hold the right to "objectively dismiss the proposal."

"While we do not agree with the players association's characterization of today's meeting or the status of the NBA's bargaining proposal, David will address the subject of collective bargaining during his media availability prior to All-Star Saturday night," NBA deputy commissioner Adam Silver said.

Stern seems intent on regaining control of the finances for a league that he says has more than half its teams losing money.

Word had started to leak in recent weeks that ownership was going to take a hard line in their opening salvo of negotiations. Hunter said the proposal "was five times worse than what we expected." Fisher characterized the league's proposal as all take and no give.

Hunter said the league is proposing several things the union finds egregious:

1. The league wants to eliminate fully guaranteed contracts.

2. The league wants to reduce the players' percentage of basketball related income from 57 percent to 40 percent once it calculates a formula that introduces expenses into the equation.

3. The league wants to implement a hard cap, which will effectively eliminate the Larry Bird exception, or the ability for teams to go over the cap to re-sign their own players.

4. The league wants players re-signing with their own teams to be able to sign a maximum of four-year contracts, down from six, and everybody else to be able to sign a maximum of three-year contracts, down from five.

5. The league wants players who currently have large contracts to retroactively modify them to fit into the new model.

"We were very clear about our understanding of what the proposal held and that there was not any way we were going to be able to use it as a starting point for future collective bargaining negotiations," Fisher said. "We all agreed in the room that the NBA's proposal could not be used as a starting point."

Hunter said the primary thing the league's proposal achieved was galvanizing the players perhaps before they realized things were getting serious. Boston's All-Star power forward Kevin Garnett hinted at player anger earlier in the day, when the players met with the media.

"It is different from the perspective of what is being presented going forward and us having a new model," Garnett said. "That is what is kind of [maddening]. You tend to look and get hit with a cold snowball, if you will, because I have seen it and I have been through it and it is a bit ridiculous, to be honest."

Initially, Stern, his staff and 15 owners were scheduled to meet with the union's negotiating team. But once the players started to realize the severity of the proposal and the repercussions it could have on their futures, a group that included Garnett, James, Wade, Paul Pierce, Johnson, Amar'e Stoudemire, Carmelo Anthony, Bosh, Al Horford and Rajon Rondo skipped their league-mandated community service to join the union's leadership group of Fisher, Keyon Dooling, Mason, Maurice Evans, Theo Ratliff and Adonal Foyle.

James apparently spoke in the meeting, as did several other reputable players who expressed anger at the sentiment that ownership was trying to crush the union. Phoenix owner Robert Sarver, San Antonio's Peter Holt and Boston's Wyc Grousbeck were the most vocal members of ownership, according to Mason.

Hunter and several others said the meeting became heated at times, and the All-Stars who planned to stay for only 40 minutes before departing for their obligations ended up staying the entire time.

"I think that they [the owners] maybe underestimated the response, the blowback that they were going to get from the proposal," Hunter said. "Pretty much everything they could think of in the last 15 years was in that proposal."

The league is hoping to fix several elements of the current CBA. The league's top-paid player, Houston's Tracy McGrady, who earns $23 million, has barely played this season. Most of the trade discussions have revolved around teams saving money rather than getting more competitive. Many teams are losing money as their fan base dwindles.

Fisher said players understand that in tough economic times some concessions need to be made by both sides. However, he also said he does not see the players willing to necessarily commit to giving anything up in negotiations.

Ultimately, it seems, the union wants to discuss some form of revenue sharing in which small-market teams would be propped up by larger-market teams which have higher television revenue and gate receipts. That would replicate the NFL's model, which has been largely successful because of enormous television revenue.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/frank_hughes/02/12/labor.talks/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...