Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A very basic litmus test 4 Fox (nothing to do with QBs)

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

Ever since our last conference championship, it has been painfully obvious the we need another viable threat at WR. Over the last several years we have drafted projects who were suspect (Carter, Colbert, and Jarrett), signed an injury prone vet who made close to zero impact (Hackett), and signed two vets who were good in their prime, but had (and have) seen their better days (Moose and Johnson).

I mean, "Wow!" The only thing that has saved our passing game at all is Smitty (no disrespect to the second tenure of an old Moose). If not for him, our wide receiving corps would have been a wide receiving corpse. Truly! We have made by on Smitty's back, basically, but of course this has made our passing game highly inefficient, suspect and vulnerable.

So, I am here to tell you guys, right now: if John Fox doesn't address our need---Smitty's need---for a viable, bona fide threat at WR to take the pressure off of Smitty (and the rest of our offense), then Fox is a football fool of epic proportions. Our passing game has been akin to a bird trying to fly with a broken wing for years. We are a Smitty away from having Oakland's passing game.

Yes, a possible franchise QB may be the best thing that happens for this football team's long term success (except for a new philosophy, err, coach), but I am here to tell you that a top-flight WR should be what you look for to see if Fox can do the impossible: win and work himself back into the good graces of the majority of Panther land, and show that he deserves our confidence once again. If Fox can't do this, then there will not only be a parade of red flags, but that lone white flag come December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
err456 Newbie

err456

Posted
Posted

I don't think so.

Fox and Co. Have drafted and brought in several recievers that just haven't panned out. Dwane Jarret, DJ Hacket, the other USC wide reciever.

It's not like they haven't tried.

Has anyone thought that maybe Jake could be maybe just a little bit to blame? I sure as hell have! Jarret looked pretty good the last game with Moore throwing him the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceMan Proficient

AceMan

Posted
Posted

Now that I think about it im almost positive Jake had something to do with that earthquake in Haiti as well...just sayin

Jake Delhomme caused Hurricane Katrina.

Honestly, I would not be surprised if Fox drafts a QB or WR extremely low or don't at all. Those positions take time to develop and he is on his way out. I'm looking to see if we re-sign Moose...if we do, he is guaranteed to be our #2 and all of the young talent like Jarrett are effectively buried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't think so.

Fox and Co. Have drafted and brought in several recievers that just haven't panned out. Dwane Jarret, DJ Hacket, the other USC wide reciever.

It's not like they haven't tried.

But have they given it their best? Something that sticks out like a huge soar spot on our offense needs focused attention. Intellectually, it seems like we could have at least gotten lucky in several years.

There is a problem somewhere. Why can the Eagles be lucky with a Deshaun Jackson, the Bears with Earl Bennett and Johnny Knox, the Colts with Garcon and Collie, the Broncos with Eddie Royal, the Cowboys with Miles Austin (and to a lesser extent, Patrick Crayton), the Bills with Lee Evans, etc.? Now, not to say that some of these guys have lit the world on fire, but most have proven that they can and will catch the ball and burn defenses when given the chance, and have high upside with their best years in front of them. None of them, as with most WRs, are first round picks. When you think of first round picks---yes there are some busts, but...there are guys like Megatron, Fitz, Santonio Holmes, Roddy White, Braylon Edwards, Robert Meachem (yes, Robert Meachem), and others who have gotten the job done. We are just floundering when it comes to our WR2/WR3 position, and have been for years. This year has to be different. It just has to.

Regarding Delhomme, I believe that it's a little too easy to blame it on him. To me, if it's not the type of talent that we are bringing in---which I believe has to be the focus and/or main culprit---then it has to be the play calling.

Either way, our offense has to get a second, viable WR1/WR2 combination punch into the regular flow of our games (much less our athletically gifted TEs, ala Antonio Gates).

I mean, "Damn!"

It's like every WR that we have gotten over the last few years looks like a babe on the outside---especially after a few drinks---but when you get them home, on your way to second base, you realize that they've got stones.

How inept can Fox and company be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

Ever since our last conference championship, it has been painfully obvious the we need another viable threat at WR.

no, this is not true

in 2004, Smith went down, but it looked like Keary Colbert was poised to break out and become a serious number 2 receiver.

or are you referring to 2005?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

no, this is not true

in 2004, Smith went down, but it looked like Keary Colbert was poised to break out and become a serious number 2 receiver.

or are you referring to 2005?

Well, Fiz, that's a matter of opinion---I'll give you that! But history has not been kind to Colbert. Other than Carruth, I could argue that he's the biggest disappointment at the position that we've had. But, then again, we've had several disappointments over the years. It's definitely not a 'Who's who?" crew here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fanpanther
      Fix Your Franchise: Carolina Panthers

      By fanpanther · Posted

      100% even if rest of team is really talented if they march young out to be qb and he plays like he has for 90% of his starts the panthers have already lost doesnt even matter how good the rest of the team is or isnt and also makes it hard to even tell how good they are.  They need true competition for young this offseason.  
    • dave-o
      Another renovation to BoA?

      By dave-o · Posted

      It will be awesome to have an improved stadium to lose in I guess....   https://www.yahoo.com/news/panthers-file-rezoning-bank-america-111500840.html     The Carolina Panthers have taken another necessary step toward renovating their home of the present and future. Panthers Stadium, LLC, filed its rezoning site plan with the city of Charlotte on Monday, initiating an important — if mostly technical — step toward renovating Bank of America Stadium. The filings state that the rezoning relates “primarily to technical aspects associated with improvements to Bank of America Stadium,” and that the rezoning is required because “the current stadium zoning is out of date” for the team’s stadium renovation plans.   The planned stadium updates include new seats installed throughout the upper and lower bowls; stadium safety and security enhancements; a reimagined South Lawn Pavilion; upgraded restrooms; exterior enhancements (including LED video boards) and more. Planning for the stadium renovation project will continue through 2025, with construction starting in 2026 and the renovation’s conclusion in 2029, The Observer previously reported.
    • WhoKnows
      Mcshay Unsure T-mac is a wr 1 or X..

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      In my dream, we somehow luck into a top 2 pick and someone wants a QB bad and doesn’t want anyone else to jump them. Somehow we’ll probably screw up the picks anyway, but it would be nice to do even partially what Chicago did to us. We’d have to lose out, which is a decent possibility unless Tampa is resting. We need Atlanta to stay within a game because Atlanta beat Tampa twice. The rest of the draft slots are who knows because Jax plays the Raiders and then Tennessee and you never know who will rest starters. I think we are top 7 unless we somehow pull out 2 more wins. The 4 win teams have higher SOS and there is only one 5 win team with the same SOS. If we win 1 of 3, we still should stay in top 7. If we lose out and the Jax games work for us, we can easily be top 3.
×
×
  • Create New...