Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Locked on Panthers: The good, the bad, and the ugly: Chris Tabor not considering sitting Bryce


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

In the first 10 minutes, he talks about if Tabor should have the authority to bench Young or not. He is of the opinion that Tabor shouldn't have the say since he shouldn't be brought back and that it is too late to bench Young. He also brings up the possibility of Tepper forcing the next coach to bring Tabor back since Tabor is a favorite of Tepper. That to me is the scary part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have had many opportunities to bench Bryce. I think Tepper was nervous they may actually win some games and it would tank Bryce's confidence, not that it hasn't already been tanked. At this point, only 4 games left, just let him finish the season and put something, anything on the field that shows potential or growth going into next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

They have had many opportunities to bench Bryce. I think Tepper was nervous they may actually win some games and it would tank Bryce's confidence, not that it hasn't already been tanked. At this point, only 4 games left, just let him finish the season and put something, anything on the field that shows potential or growth going into next season. 

That's pretty much what Julian says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tabor looks like a yes man. The fact he took the interim position should seriously raise the questions about his mental abilities and motivations given the ugly behind the scenes going on in that building.

I just wonder if he realized his mistake yet or if he is just that dumb. Looking at his coaching philosophies I am leaning towards dumb

 

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Tabor looks like a yes man. The fact he took the interim position should seriously raise the questions about his mental abilities and motivations given the ugly behind the scenes going on in that building.

I just wonder if he realized his mistake yet or if he is just that dumb. Looking at his cosching philosophies I am leaning towards dumb

 

Surely it came with an increase in pay. I mean, if you're stuck in this ship for the time being might as well bang as many of Tepper's dollars as you can.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Surely it came with an increase in pay. I mean, if you're stuck in this ship for the time being might as well bang as many of Tepper's dollars as you can.

Unless his plan is to get fired and collect that money while somewhere else it can't possibly be worth it. It looks like career suicide. Fank was prepared for retirement when he took the job so that makes sense.

Seriously who is going to want to work with the guy given the entire situation? IDK but I wouldn't bet on him getting a great next job or the new HC being happy with having to keep the guy either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Tabor looks like a yes man.

This is the answer to any Tabor question. Dude was free for Rhule to hire and took the job. Same for the Oline coach. Then Reich was urged to retain both, which he did. That to me says they care more about the the money and sucking up to the owner than actually doing a good job.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If the standard for being able to bench Young is that you're going to be back next season, I'm not sure anybody has that authority 😕

As far as who I would leave the decision up to, probably Jim Caldwell.

I don't think Young should be benched. At this point, just leave him out there. If it "breaks" him, maybe he'll do like Collins did once upon a time and quit.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF do people want Young benched? We aren’t a contender so WTF do we care if we go 1-16 or 4-13? We learn nothing from Dalton starting.

Let Young finish the year and honestly, start 2024. We have pick 33. The chance of us getting a long term QB starter in the 2024 draft is minuscule. We aren’t that lucky.

If you don’t believe in Young, you want him starting. If he can’t do the job, well after a second year the new coach and GM have the ammo to say QB in 2025. Thanks Young for getting us a top 3 pick, you’re the backup.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I don't think Young should be benched. At this point, just leave him out there. If it "breaks" him, maybe he'll do like Collins did once upon a time and quit.

I don't see the point of continuing this. How is continuing this better than outting Daltonin and trying to string together a little momentum?

Is Bryce confidently getting worse? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

WTF do people want Young benched? We aren’t a contender so WTF do we care if we go 1-16 or 4-13? We learn nothing from Dalton starting.

Let Young finish the year and honestly, start 2024. We have pick 33. The chance of us getting a long term QB starter in the 2024 draft is minuscule. We aren’t that lucky.

If you don’t believe in Young, you want him starting. If he can’t do the job, well after a second year the new coach and GM have the ammo to say QB in 2025. Thanks Young for getting us a top 3 pick, you’re the backup.

What more do you really need to learn about Young this season? He has already proven what he is and regardless he is here next year to compete or be given the job again.

Why not focus on trying to build up other players and not having the bust of a QB keep the entire offense from any legitimate chance to improve the last few weeks?

Edited by Waldo
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most productive the Panther offense has been was the 37-27 loss to Seattle. Oh yeah, Dalton played that game. Oh yeah, that was Week 3.

The Panthers and Bryce Young haven't come close to matching the relative success of that game, yet Bryce Young is still trotting out there every week. This leads me to ask a simple question:

Is it the goal of the Panthers to attempt to develop a QB with limited athletic and physical talent or, is it the goal of the team to win games. Because, if we're being honest and going back to the words of both John Fox and Ron Rivera, who gives the team the best opportunity to win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...