Leadership

[TLGPanthersFan]

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Good chance may have kept a good portion of the staff intact.

With a coach like Wilks, you really need savant X's and O's guys at the coordinator spots because that's not his forté.

I don't know that Holcomb fits that bill.

You can look it up online. But there is an article saying Holcomb would remain our DC if Wilks is hired. 
Nah, Holcomb proved a number of times he was a low to mid tier DC. 

[UnluckyforSome]

The reality is anyone that isn't in lockstep with Tepper is going to have a difficult road. As he willingly pointed out in his press conference he reserves the right to veto whatever and whenever. Until there is a shift there of some sort, the status quo will continue.

Edited November 29, 2023 by UnluckyforSome

[Samppson]

16 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

Preach. That’s why I’m talking myself more and more into a coach with a defensive background. Mayo, Anarumo, a real culture setter

I'm not opposed to a defensive coach, I think there's some advantages to it, as less of them get HC jobs so it should in theory be easier to get the best of the best on the defensive side. I'm just surprised that when mentioning defensive HC candidates, you didn't mention the one right in front of our eyes in Evero, guy is a stud, what he's doing with an very injured defense and an inept offense is spectacular imo.

[Mr. Scot]

4 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

You can look it up online. But there is an article saying Holcomb would remain our DC if Wilks is hired. 
Nah, Holcomb proved a number of times he was a low to mid tier DC. 

I remember.

And yeah...

[pantherclaw]

Wilks was unquestionably a leader of men. 

No one on the huddle wanted Holcomb as DC. 

Most didn't want another defensive minded HC, even if it was Wilks. 

 

[Stumpy]

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

I’m not keeping tract of the the TB 2.0 right now…

No need to insult the Tinderbox like that...

[Harbingers]

59 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

No need to insult the Tinderbox like that...