Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football Week 11: As the Harbaugh Continues to Turn


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

It took him 6 tries to win the biggest game on Michigan's schedule. To be fair, he's won that game twice in a row now. But if he leaves Michigan, it'll be because he got ran out just like how he left the NFL and landed the Michigan gig. He also really seemed to have worn out his welcome in SF and his style works well enough on college kids. Hard pass.

He was ran out of San Fran with his record and success? He has some attitude yes and probably won't take too much of Tepper's poo without giving it back to him but nothing wrong with that when you have a meddling owner as we do. He is very good with QB's and seems as if he is no pushover. Why fear a guy with some attitude? I would take him immediately if we could get him and then watch the teams success finally rise consistently. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wasn't it just two years ago that Harbaugh got interviewed for the Vikings job?

Story there was he walked in like he owned the place and was ready to start giving orders, till they told him" eeehh, no thanks, we're good" 😕

Yeah ok how on earth would you know if that’s true 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...