Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 48: Bobcats@Lakers


King Taharqa

Recommended Posts

Hell yes Jordy! Great game you guys, I can't believe we finally beat y'all. The game in Charlotte will be just like this one. You guys can say you didn't have Wallace, but Kobe was not himself either. Looking forward to it. GO LAKERS! Hope you guys the best and can make the playoffs, and I honestly believe you will make noise in the playoffs if you get Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah what a bad way to end the game. Jax was having such a good and efficient game and then he forces an inbounds. We had timeouts, 2 I think.

Other notes:

-Nazzy continues to impress me, 23 points and 17 rebounds. There's no way in hell Tyson starts when (if) he comes back

- Nice to keep Kobe in check, it didn't hurt he was in foul trouble.

-Good game considering the fact we were without Crash.

-Diaw was just a body on the court today, didn't do poo. Trade him for Jason Thompson.

Hell yes Jordy! Great game you guys, I can't believe we finally beat y'all. The game in Charlotte will be just like this one. You guys can say you didn't have Wallace, but Kobe was not himself either. Looking forward to it. GO LAKERS! Hope you guys the best and can make the playoffs, and I honestly believe you will make noise in the playoffs if you get Cleveland.

Well give credit to Charlotte for making "him not himself." Gerald's hamstring didn't allow him to play. Don't compare the two situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly fug ESPN and fug Sportscenter. I've come to expect this kind of treatment, but I don't think they even mentioned who the Lakers were playing. I'm just absolutely tired of it. The last time I heard the Bobcats mentioned on ESPN was when I woke up at 3:30 in the morning and NBA Fastbreak was on, and they were actually talking about how good we were.

It was 3 in the morning so I probably was dreaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...