Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where I'm at midseason


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

He looked decent dumping the ball off underneath - besides the 3 back breaking INTs of course. 

he looked good when the Colts just flat out busted coverage and didn't play defense.  Which were his two best plays.  I mean, credit for seeing it.  But that was the best players on the D.  Because this O can't actually challenge and beat people.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I didn't advocate for sticking with Ron.   I'm just acknowledging Wilks is essentially Ron (which is what YOU are advocating for). 

I've been consistent.  For YEARS.  We need young offensive minds.  That's what I wanted post Ron Rivera.  That's who I want to be hired.   Which we haven't done. 

and post Ron we have hired a fraudulent defensive college coach and an old dinosaur retread HC who surrounded himself with older dinosaurs to oversee things. 

We went to a SB with Ron.

 

You seem stuck on Wilks like he is the only HC I want. I said we should have kept him over Frank.

 

As for now my #1 HC would be Harbaugh. Hand him the keys and let him turn this franchise around. I don't trust Tepper making any decisions moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthering said:

I agree and I am over-reacting but are you going to disagree that Bryce is limited at the NFL level? Because that's all I'm saying. He can work around his deficiencies, and the Panthers can get better, NFL teams can turn it around in a hurry because it's happened quite a lot. But are you expecting that to happen here? Under this ownership? With this head coach? With this rookie QB? With no 1st round pick next year? That's the real problem I'm having with all of this, it's based on what we know right here right now. It's tough! 

Still going to tune in a little and watch, because at the end of the day Bryce intrigues me and I want to watch him grow. But we got to get something here and there, not what we saw yesterday against the worst defense in the league right now. Outside of Bryce, it appears we can't draft or develop talent at all, and I've always viewed that when a team cannot draft or develop any talent, then that always hits said team very hard in the following 2-3 years. 

Look at our draft return this year right now. Early returns are absolutely brutal right now, room to improve everywhere, but brutal right now. Mingo had 1 catch yesterday for 5 yards against the worst defense in the league. Downs, who we would've taken in the 2nd round if we had a freaking fan vote online for it (we should try that, would be fun as hell), is an immediate impact starter in the NFL. These kinds of misses are going to bite us these next 2-3 years before they're sadly released into the waiver wire void where all draft busts go. 

Fixes I'd do, time to focus on beefing up the line inside out RIGHT NOW. Cut your losses on Ickey at LT and move him to LG where he belongs, let him build a rapport with Bozeman and keep the right side intact. We actually have okay depth at the inside spots if we do that. Run whoever at LT and let it ride from there, we've got to turn back to a bull rushing team the rest of the year. 

Get Laviska back in there asap when he returns, screens all day to him. Let Mingo continue to develop, but test his butt on hard routes and find out if he's a true 1 sooner rather than later. Get Tremble more looks since he can block and catch a little, and keep doing your thing until the season ends. 

Best answer I could give to that honestly is this...

If you were to ask me who was the better quarterback between Joe Montana and Dan Marino, I'd say Dan Marino.

But ask me (or anyone, honestly) who had the better career, pretty much everybody is going to say Montana.

The difference, of course, was the teams around them.

That's where we have to look as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

We went to a SB with Ron.

 

You seem stuck on Wilks like he is the only HC I want. I said we should have kept him over Frank.

 

As for now my #1 HC would be Harbaugh. Hand him the keys and let him turn this franchise around. I don't trust Tepper making any decisions moving forward.

I don't know who you want.  I simply responded to your post about we should of hired Wilks.  We shouldn't of.  We shouldn't of hired Frank.  We shouldn't of hired Rhule. 

and we shouldn't hire Harbaugh.   He is a problem waiting to happen too.  So maybe we will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I felt like, mechanically, he was off. Decision-making was way off and his accuracy wasn't there, nor was his confidence. I liked his willingness to scramble and run for first downs -- he's gonna have to do that more often because it adds a much-needed wrinkle. He's better at it than he seems to think. I don't subscribe to the "noodle arm" BS because he's fit throws into tight windows (Thielen, 4th and 2, comes to mind) but the decision-making has to be better and sadly, the line and WRs need to give him more help than they're capable of providing. 

The protection problems make it extremely hard to properly evaluate him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've come to accept that Moton at LT is just never gonna happen. Fir the scheme we're running though, it'd make some sense.

What I think (hope) ultimately happens is he goes to left guard and we got a more WCO type tackle next year.

 

No trade Moton as a RT at the end of the year and flip the cheaper rookie to RT, or build up his value as a LT again and just trade him for people that fit better into their desired scheme (what they should have done when they committed to it this year). The only LT option went on IR. Maybe he can do LT in this scheme next year but that is a whole other issue. As bad as he is this year, he is still the best option moving forward and if they changed the blocking scheme then it's not a huge negative like it is in their currant mess.

There are plenty of OGs outside of the first, let alone top 10, to draft every year. I would rather see him get a shot at RT than LG moving forward. 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthering said:

I missed a lot of the Houston game so couldn't comment on that. Bryce is a rookie who's allowed to have bad games, he will bounce back! But I want the confident version of him out there testing his limits, not the scared indecisive guy. 

his average game this year will be better than yesterday's but probably worse than the Houston game.

Selective memory from some on here have them forgetting the great plays he made that game, that they continue to parrot he can't do. Additional examples of selective memory include, conveniently ignoring his LT is the worst in the league. 

But Bryce's gotta be better. He IS better than yesterday -- and he needs to prove that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I don't know who you want.  I simply responded to your post about we should of hired Wilks.  We shouldn't of.  We shouldn't of hired Frank.  We shouldn't of hired Rhule. 

and we shouldn't hire Harbaugh.   He is a problem waiting to happen too.  So maybe we will. 

Well damn who should we hire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

No trade Moton as a RT at the end of the year and flip the cheaper rookie to RT. The only LT option went on IR. Maybe he can do LT in this scheme next year but that is a whole other issue. As bad as he is this year, he is still the best option moving forward and if they changed the blocking scheme then it's not a huge negative like it is in thier currant mess.

There are plenty of OGs outside of the first, let alone top 10, to draft every year. I would rather see him get a shot at RT than LG moving forward. 

motons contract gets real expensive after this season I believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he had 35 yards at the half

I took a screenshot and posted it in the game day thread.  Young was at -9 yards passing about half way through the 2nd quarter.  In the 4th quarter as team's defenses are protecting leads is where Young is padding his stats.  They concede the underneath stuff and coincidentally where he thrives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

No trade Moton as a RT at the end of the year and flip the cheaper rookie to RT. The only LT option went on IR. Maybe he can do LT in this scheme next year but that is a whole other issue. As bad as he is this year, he is still the best option moving forward and if they changed the blocking scheme then it's not a huge negative like it is in thier currant mess.

There are plenty of OGs outside of the first, let alone top 10, to draft every year. I would rather see him get a shot at RT than LG moving forward. 

I don't wanna trade Moton.

Christensen at LT is definitely an option but I don't know that it's the best long term option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...