Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Montez Sweat new deal


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Looking more and more like a franchise tag showdown is looming... and that Scott Fitterer fugs up everything.

I have no faith in him figuring out a way to keep Burns,Brown, and Luvu this coming offseason. Even Luvu alone he'll manage to fug up, I suppose Brown could get the 5th year option

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Looking more and more like a franchise tag showdown is looming... and that Scott Fitterer fugs up everything.

Think that is around 24M for us, question is how bad would that piss off Burns and would he hold out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I have no faith in him figuring out a way to keep Burns,Brown, and Luvu this coming offseason. Even Luvu alone he'll manage to fug up, I suppose Brown could get the 5th year option

Brown’s 5th year option has already been picked up. 

But yeah, Burns will get the tag and Luvu will be the wildcard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Brown’s 5th year option has already been picked up. 

But yeah, Burns will get the tag and Luvu will be the wildcard 

Yeah but the good GM's still get the deal done sooner rather than later instead of gambling on a tag or option year to low ball franchise players. Like is he hoping Burns has a bad year so he can pay him less? I don't really like that mentality 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Sweat is better against the run then Burns.

Yeah Burns was like 60th out of 84 edge defenders against the run this year. Sweat was third out of 84. So Burns gets more sacks but Sweat hasn’t been a liability in the run game. 
 

Bears also resigned Billings on their dline to a cheap two year extension and he’s been a top ten DT per PFF this season. Now if they lock up Jaylon Johnson they may have a defense that’s starting to cook and turn things around. Bears got killed for letting Roquon Smith leave and then they signed Edmunds to a deal and they have similar tackles and sacks this year. 
 

But yeah. Burns is going to get 30+ mil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As a VT fan, powell-ryland isn't a guy I'd put very high on an NFL list. I'm nervous the development path is minimal and he's maxed out physically. I don't see a 3 down guy there.  Savion jones is the untapped potential guy. He's worth a look as that's rare size speed and length. I get it, the production isn't there. But he'd be a solid guy that late (4th) that sticks for all downs in multiple systems. Diggs is a guy that might stick 3 downs in a 3-4 as an OLB. He's built longer than APR so I get why APR is so low on this list. He's like APR that he's older for the class and worry the potential jump is smaller than some of the others. 
    • Cam Jordan said something on GMFB this morning I didn't know that took qb off the table for NO.  He said that NO has not taken a qb in the 1st round since Archie Manning. 
    • There is at least some speculation that sanders may go to new orleans at 9.  That makes us a logical trade partner for anyone that wants him. Even if the saints don't really want him, it benefits us if other teams think they might.  If they do and we block them, even better. If we were offered anything like the op mentions, we should accept.  Then maybe trade up for a 2nd late first rounder.  Id love to get an edge and wr late in the first.  If we could do that and add a 26 1st, that would be amazing. 
×
×
  • Create New...