Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for the Burns pocket watchers...


CamWhoaaCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who is overpaid on the roster right now?

 

Didn't know Burns is holding up money for other FA's.

 

Also curious how teams like the Bengals have a competitive roster and they have the highest paid QB in the league.

 

Interesting how people can't explain this but because Burns wants 30mil he's not affordable.

It’s math.  If you pay Burns 100M guaranteed it impacts what else you can put on the team.  And we need a lot.    Specifically on O.  Specifically as we try to groom Bryce into a good QB. 

Bengals have been successful in recent history  because of offensive draft picks.  They put their emphasis there.  Great cheap players.   They are entering a new window where they have to pay people and that will impact what they can do with the rest of the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who is overpaid on the roster right now?

 

Didn't know Burns is holding up money for other FA's.

 

Also curious how teams like the Bengals have a competitive roster and they have the highest paid QB in the league.

 

Interesting how people can't explain this but because Burns wants 30mil he's not affordable.

Because Burrow just became the highest paid QB. Last year, Burrow,Chase and Higgins counted a combined 17.5M last year. And still only combine for 32M this year. And two DEs as good or better than Burns at less than Burns wants by himself. 

The Panthers have 55.75M in dead cap this year. The Bengals have 3M. That’s the difference. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

They don't need Higgins.

 

Im also not sure why they kept him. If he isn't in the longterm it would make sense to get something for him. For all we know they might actually bring him back. Never know in these kind of situations.

Burrow is 55m. 

Chase is on his rookie deal. He is going to want a new contract after 23 when he's eligible. 

Higgins is on his rookie contract. They will need to give him a new one too. 

There is now way they're getting all 3 players for under 100m a year. That's why cap space matters. You can't pay everyone what they want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Burrow is 55m. 

Chase is on his rookie deal. He is going to want a new contract after 23 when he's eligible. 

Higgins is on his rookie contract. They will need to give him a new one too. 

There is now way they're getting all 3 players for under 100m a year. That's why cap space matters. You can't pay everyone what they want. 

So we trade Burns what is the plan next?

 

Use that pick on another pass rusher?

 

Sign Tee Higgins and who else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

A few extra mil is not going to make him a problem.

 

So you would sign him for 28mil a yr but add an extra 2 mil which would be 30 mil a yr and now we can't make moves?

 

Cmon Jimmy lets be realistic.

I know you know this but the salary cap is a zero sum game. Millions extra paid to a player who has not earned them negates the ability to use those millions for other players. 

If you are a long time fan of the Panthers, you know the team has often found itself in salary cap turmoil due to paying players more than they deserve. I don’t want the team to keep doing that. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...