Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Basketball 2023


beo
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Quote above was for you not shocker. What are you 15? Lol.

Just say you were wrong about UNC not being a #1 seed. You made it seem like the loss was going to eliminate them from the #1 seed.

 

Cmon friend just man up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Just say you were wrong about UNC not being a #1 seed. You made it seem like the loss was going to eliminate them from the #1 seed.

 

Cmon friend just man up.

No, I thought it COULD and your “professionals” agreed with me all day today, but you don’t want to talk about that do you? You acted like it was some out of left field ridiculous idea, and the outcome doesn’t change how stupid you look for it. Man up and admit you were completely uninformed and acting smug and arrogant for no reason. Do you want me to go start quoting all your prisoner of the moment flip flopping and terrible hot takes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It was GUARANTEED we were getting paired with Arizona. The selection committee LOVES those potential storylines. Yep, they're already talking about it. LOL

The media had the ACC wildly underrated. ESPN only has four teams projected in.

Pretty messed up for them to give a 1 seed a potential away game in the elite 8. I wonder if it would have been better to get a 2 seed in a different region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Pretty messed up for them to give a 1 seed a potential away game in the elite 8. I wonder if it would have been better to get a 2 seed in a different region.

It didn't matter how it played out. We were getting paired with Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Half surprised to not see the committee put Kentucky, Kansas, and Wisconsin in UNC’s region. Those three teams have been fairly common opponents for the Heels in the tourney. They did sneak Michigan State in there though.

Now that Roy has retired the KU matchup doesn't have near the storyline to it.

I would've welcomed them this year though. Sucks for them but they suffered some very key injuries late and they're reeling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

Lol, name something I said that was non factual. I was always open to the possibility of either team getting the one seed. As a fan I wanted UNC to get it. Fact is, UNC is fortunate not to lose that 1 seed, and you are fortunate to get bailed out after acting like a smug ass for zero reason when you clearly didn’t realize how close it was. Your whole reasoning of what the “experts” said, lol, let’s talk about how the experts were talking all day about whether it would be Iowa State or UNC as the final 1. According to them it wasn’t the “lock” for UNC that you were selling. A broken clock is right twice per day, doesn’t change anything about you looking uninformed and arrogant in your ignorance.

The Land Of Make Believe Wow GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Rodgers but probably not for the political reasons I bet a lot of posters are motivated by. I just think he is not the QB for the Panthers, at all. 
    • Sun Devils just scored another TD on BYU, 14-0
    • It wasn't great but  the 2022 NYG won 9 of 16 games plus a playoff game. He had a 92.5 passer rating. 15 pass TDs 3200 yards, 7 rushing TD, 700 yards 6 fumbles 3 lost.  His first season he had 18 fumbles lost 11. Wow.  Anyhow he had problems in 2023 with injuries and didn't win poo before tearing his ACL. This year, no Barkley, not good, but you know.... these ACLs take a while and it was right and he throws right so pushes off of it.  I agree it doesn't hurt to let that guy compete cheap. You don't hand him the job like with Bryce or NYG with him.  When I look at what we have been saddled with, he doesn't look worse and has the physical advantage. So I don't get the umbrage given our situation. This "No we won't settle for anything less that the best" attitude and then taking Bryce Young was pathetic and I think that attitude brought us to where we are. That's where that poo gets you. Away from Mayfield, away from Darnold, even away from PJ - just to replace them with an inferior PJ.  At the same time I am not really advocating for the guy just looking at it objectively. It could be another guy with the same story. And yes the odds of him getting it are low but the numbers and performance from 2022 are for sure better than we see with Bryce even after a season of major propping him up with better players around him. Take a look don't take a look he fails or he doesn't fail...   to instead sit here and be happier with what we have is bullshit. 
×
×
  • Create New...