Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Postseason Power Rankings from ESPN

Montsta

By Montsta,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

LOL....so the Chargers and Steelers have a better WR corps than we do? Im not even going to comment on the QB thing, that is just absurd. Also, we should have the #1 rated RB's.

Thank you joemac.

Steve Smith >>>>> Hines Ward >> Vincent Jackson

Moose >> Malcolm Floyd, Limas Sweed, Chris Chambers, Santonio Holmes...

How this math works is beyond me.

And I'd like to go on the record as saying I can't shake this feeling that Jarrett is going to show up in a BIG way this postseason. I don't know why cuz I've never really even much cared for the kid, but I just can't shake the feeling.

You heard it here first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted

...FaQ ESPN (extra special penis network)...I dont care what they have to say since my TV hasn't been on that station since 1999 when Prince was the sh!t...I like our players and our intagibles and if Fox would get the h3ll out of the way we'd run away with the Bowl...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

Thank you joemac.

Steve Smith >>>>> Hines Ward >> Vincent Jackson

Moose >> Malcolm Floyd, Limas Sweed, Chris Chambers, Santonio Holmes...

How this math works is beyond me.

And I'd like to go on the record as saying I can't shake this feeling that Jarrett is going to show up in a BIG way this postseason. I don't know why cuz I've never really even much cared for the kid, but I just can't shake the feeling.

You heard it here first.

I have a feeling they are talking about a WR core, not singular players. And yes, I would take SD's core over ours, but not any player overf SS.

Jackson, Chambers, Davis, Floyd, Nannee. There is some depth there.

vs. SS, Hack, Jarrett, Moose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolinarolls Newbie

carolinarolls

Posted
Posted

With the lousy performances Jake had in the middle of the season and the fantastic display of RB play from Dewill and even Stewart it's easy to downgrade Jake to 11. Flacco who has led a team that is usually offensive deficient as a rookie is easily seen as more valuable to most. Collins has had a great year and even though he to works with a great RB tandem, he was forced to win with his arm and prevailed when the Titan run was schemed against and taken away. Chad Pennington has shined all year despite working in an offensively handicapped roster under new..everything.

11 is not that bad. I know you guys do not expect Jake to crack the top ten with plays to Smitty like the one that set up JA KaY last Sunday. Those throws rarely win you many points with these guys.

He did play some great games this season but as is the norm with Jake, there were som real stinkers to accompany them and the winners had some pretty questionable heaves that just plain worked out largely due to one Steve Smith.

I know you guys don't like hearing that but c'mon, take the BDJS blinders off and be happy about Jake being at 11 after a major surgery and a missed season. It's really not that bad.

I'm ecstatic over it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have a feeling they are talking about a WR core, not singular players. And yes, I would take SD's core over ours, but not any player overf SS.

Jackson, Chambers, Davis, Floyd, Nannee. There is some depth there.

vs. SS, Hack, Jarrett, Moose.

That's the point I was trying to make fuzz. Steve Smith is so far superior to every other wideout on San Diego and Pittsburgh that the decent to mediocre talent behind him on the depth chart is offset by him alone, making our WR core better than those. Am I gonna say better than Indy or Arizona? Certainly not. But SD, give me a break...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybodyhome
      Canes vs Bruins 7pm Halloween Edition!

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • Jackie Lee
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...