Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the Best Steakhouse in Charlotte?


Happy Panther

Best  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Best

    • Sullivan's
      0
    • Ruth's Chris
    • Capital Grille
    • Beef and Bottle
    • The Palm
      0
    • Del Friscos
      0
    • Chima
    • Mortons
    • Outback/RanchHouse/Gus's sir beef/Flemings etc
    • Something else


Recommended Posts

But I must say that for the money, there is something to be said for a good ol' $8.99 sirlion at the Texas Roadhouse washed down with a cold beer.

I have to agree. For the money they make a pretty good steak. We share the NY Strip.

Note to Jangler: Texas Roadhouse has some cute looking girls as waitress, some of them even look like they aren't 18 yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. For the money they make a pretty good steak. We share the NY Strip.

Note to Jangler: Texas Roadhouse has some cute looking girls as waitress, some of them even look like they aren't 18 yet.

:lol: That is very true...we go to the one near Concord Mills and I don't think there is one over 18. Probably why my son wants to work there this summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: That is very true...we go to the one near Concord Mills and I don't think there is one over 18. Probably why my son wants to work there this summer.

We typically go to that one too.

Smart kid. I imagine the manager is a perv considering there are very few unattractive waitress and very few male waiters and like i said they are all super young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...