Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the Saints win it, or did the Vikings lose it?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

You're correct. The St. Louis kicker missed his FG first...I think. If that's the case, then they lost it. If Kasay missed his first then we won it. I forget which happened though.

I can't remember either, to be honest.

My point is this: the better team usually wins the game. It doesn't matter if one team "lost the game" due to turnovers or poor mistakes; that's why they lost, and that's why the better team -- the team that didn't make as many costly mistakes -- won the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree with you, Carolina may never have made it to the Super Bowl were that the case.

Ah, but St. Louis lost that game -- the Panthers didn't win it.

If you remember Carolina and SL played a scoreless 1st OT

Carolina scored in the 2nd OT

Both teams had plenty of chances to win.

The Vikes lost it by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you remember Carolina and SL played a scoreless 1st OT

Carolina scored in the 2nd OT

Both teams had plenty of chances to win.

I realize that.

All I'm saying is that if you're going to find fault with the current overtime rules (and I'm of the opinion they should be changed as well), then you can't propose a change in the rules for some situations but not others. So in this case, it would be unfair to say that a team should have a chance to match another team's score, unless they've both gone through an overtime period and "had chances."

This discussion is comical, because we're talking about overtime when both teams had the four quarters before overtime to win the game as well. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vikings turned the ball over 6 times, they lost it. 2 for farve and 2 for AP, it's why AP hasn't been the best back in the league the last few years. You can't be a great RB and fumble as much as he does. 20 fumbles in 3 seasons doesn't make a back great. Good game to the saints though, the defense stepped up when it counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...