Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the Saints win it, or did the Vikings lose it?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

vikings lost it. ADP fumbles all day. they had that game won in the last two minutes and if they didn't have that false start and farve not thrown that INT, they would have won.

also, the saints won because of the stupid OT rules. those things are crap. only 1 team really gets a shot to score. in fairness the other team should get a chance to answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brett throws it away again, everything else is window dressing. There were a few bad calls, sure, and the Vikes should be happy as hell they got the ball back after fumbling the times that they did. Not the Saints fault that they protected Brees as well as they did.

It was the Vikes to lose and they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also, the saints won because of the stupid OT rules. those things are crap. only 1 team really gets a shot to score. in fairness the other team should get a chance to answer.

While I agree with you, Carolina may never have made it to the Super Bowl were that the case.

Ah, but St. Louis lost that game -- the Panthers didn't win it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree with you, Carolina may never have made it to the Super Bowl were that the case.

Ah, but St. Louis lost that game -- the Panthers didn't win it.

Absolutely not true.

The Panthers vs Rams game went to Double OT. A second OT period continues with the team that had the posession at the end of the OT having posession at the beginning of the OT....much like between the 1st and 2nd qtrs.

Both teams had opportunities to win that game in OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not true.

The Panthers vs Rams game went to Double OT. A second OT period continues with the team that had the posession at the end of the OT having posession at the beginning of the OT....much like between the 1st and 2nd qtrs.

Both teams had opportunities to win that game in OT.

Yes, but if you were going to take away the "sudden death" aspect of NFL overtime and allow the opposing team a drive after one team scores, then why wouldn't that also apply to double overtime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree with you, Carolina may never have made it to the Super Bowl were that the case.

Ah, but St. Louis lost that game -- the Panthers didn't win it.

You're correct. The St. Louis kicker missed his FG first...I think. If that's the case, then they lost it. If Kasay missed his first then we won it. I forget which happened though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...