Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?


Shotgun
 Share

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?  

176 members have voted

  1. 1. If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?

    • #1
      24
    • #2-#5
      70
    • Not in the top 10
      35
    • Not in the first round
      47


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, falconlynx said:

Plays like a 3rd or 4th rounder. 

Who hasn't for a while?

I was going to say it started with Goff and Wentz, two guys that were really lackluster in comparison to many of the starting QBs at the time. But really, its much much worse.

The league has had tons and tons of 1st round QBs after that who just simply did not stand out.

Locker, Ponder, Gabbert.

Tannehill, Weeden.

EJ Manuel

Bortles, Manziel, Bridgewater

Winston, Mariota

Goff, Wentz, Paxton Lynch

Trubisky

Mayfield, Rosen

Daniel Jones, Dewayne Haskins

Teams want SO badly for the next big thing at QB that they often spend a 1st round pick on a QB that is a 3rd round talent or so.

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny enough, that’s how they used Mykel some of the time at UGA (and how him numbers weren’t high) he slid inside - they had Walker and would use guys like Wilson II, Wilson, or Harris across from Walker at the edge on passing downs.  
    • I will say this:  The Steelers used to be notorious for letting players go in what seemed to be their primes and that player would often begin their downward trajectory.  Barry Foster, for example, came to the Panthers from Pittsburgh and was a dud.  Kevin Greene shows the other side.  If Moton's knees are not as bad as thought, he could play another 4 seasons. If deteriorating knees leads to deteriorating performance, then we held the hot potato too long.  This is true with every player, and I have read articles about players on third contracts compared to first and second contracts and most NFL players seem to be overpaid--but OL tend to earn their money and hold up the best, based on my memory.  I do not care about how a player retires or how a player might feel if traded--that is part of the business and they are compensated very well.  I do, however, worry about the locker room; if players see vets getting sent to the slaughter house, it may impact their psyche.  So it is a delicate situation.  Moton is one of the high character, dependable, quality players on the roster. We have not worried about RT for nearly a decade (Flashback:  Super Bowl 50).  We have him under contract for another season and his knees are questionable, based on rumor. If you trade him based on his knees, you will not get value for him--the trade could get vetoed.  With his age, health, and contract situation, you are not getting more than a fourth rounder for him--not enough to replace his productivity.  There is a time when you try to squeeze a few more brushings out of the tooth paste tube and there is a time to throw it away.  Is there toothpaste left in the tube?  Yep.  Is it possible that the time to throw the tube away happens during the season?  Yep.  I understand the logic behind the OP's point and it is nothing that should solicit personal criticisms and rude reactions that are offensive.  Learn how to disagree.  However, if you see the problems other teams have at OT for years, etc. those of you wanting Moton to stay are also endorsing the idea of having a rookie OT on the right side in 2026, when this team should be competitive.  The coin has 2 sides.  I think you draft that RT this season (day 2) and you leave Moton there--but I get it if Morgan trades Moton for more picks to help us meet our needs. We need an edge, a S, and an OT right now--with Moton on the roster--in my view.  That player would develop and serve as depth (knees).  You don't draft for 2025 needs only.  These are 4-year contracts.  
    • The tinfoil hat version is they're waiting until after the draft so some teams think we might go OT in the draft? Idk lol 
×
×
  • Create New...