Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Ducks 8:30


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Back to back or not, on paper this is one we should have no problem winning.

I’d like to see Chatfield anchor the third pairing and only use TDA on the PP.

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - Chatfield

DeAngelo (PP only)

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Drury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Back to back or not, on paper this is one we should have no problem winning.

I’d like to see Chatfield anchor the third pairing and only use TDA on the PP.

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - Chatfield

DeAngelo (PP only)

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Drury

I so love Aho on our top scoring line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Raanta being in will benefit our dmen, particularly Orlov who knows he needs to ingratiate himself to all of our goalies. Plus Raanta has a chance to prove he can split more of the load which would obviously benefit Freddie and the team as a whole.

 

Keep out of the box, stop letting the opponent have great chances in transition and we'll be fine. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lightsout said:

I think Raanta being in will benefit our dmen, particularly Orlov who knows he needs to ingratiate himself to all of our goalies. Plus Raanta has a chance to prove he can split more of the load which would obviously benefit Freddie and the team as a whole.

 

Keep out of the box, stop letting the opponent have great chances in transition and we'll be fine. 

I think mdc is right, orlov is going to have the same learning curve as burns. Except we’ve kinda stacked our offensive D a little heavy. I also agree with who ever said chatty and orlov need to partner. TDA is the real odd man out here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Chatfield again…

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Drury - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - DeAngelo

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Chatfield

 

I might be in the minority but I’d sit Drury 100 times out of 100 and go 11 and 7 with Chatfield drawing in.

If we’re going to be on the PK damn near ten times then let’s get another defenseman out there that can kill penalties.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

No Chatfield again…

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Drury - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - DeAngelo

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Chatfield

 

I might be in the minority but I’d sit Drury 100 times out of 100 and go 11 and 7 with Chatfield drawing in.

If we’re going to be on the PK damn near ten times then let’s get another defenseman out there that can kill penalties.

I’d sit TDA over Drury. Chatty should be in on the third pair so far TDA has just been a liability. Especially on PP 1 with burns. Burns should be QBing. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've watched and listened to several evaluations from the good ole youtubers.  From what I was able to watch, the first few drives before I left to do a job to the end of the game were very different for Bryce.  So he had a "good" game.  Which is great.  I love a win, period.  His WRs had some drops, thing ripped away, etc.  Not great, but a W is a W, right? I think the Panthers have to start Bryce.  You have to see if he continues to build on the good plays and make fewer and fewer bad plays.  No QB is going to play a perfect game.  But we need to continue to see Bryce make plays.  Does he have the ability to will his team to victory?  I'm not sure. I'm still in the Bryce is a backup QB camp.  I'm glad he had a good game, I glad we won, but I need to see more before we make a decision to keep or trade him.  Playing Andy literally does NOTHING to help you for the future.  Andy may not even resign with the Panthers.  We could be out both starting QBs by the time FA/Draft season hits. Ultimately, this is a Dan Morgan and Dave Canales issue.  Can they get value out of Bryce to help them improve the total roster?  Is there a FA QB who would be an upgrade?  A surprise cut or post season trade?  Or is there a QB at the top of the draft who they think they can mold into a high level starting QB?  I don't know. I do know I want to see more of Bryce Young and more out of him on the field.  I want to see the fire, the competitor come out.  I want him getting pissed.  I want him to grab his beanbag and tell us all he's the f'ing dude.  I just don't think we'll see that out of Bryce.  If not the fire, then let me see the ice - let me see the rattle proof dude who kills with accuracy and playmaking no matter how hot and crazy it gets.
    • Ickey at LT and Brady as Center / Swing position player is more valuable to our team IMO
    • That's fair but signing a veteran like Justin Fields to a one year deal and drafting defense with our first is always an option two.  I personally don't think these QBs this year are top 10 worthy selections
×
×
  • Create New...