Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your prefered smoking device??


Mayor Qumiby

What do you like smoking out of the best  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you like smoking out of the best

    • Blunt
      2
    • Joint
      2
    • Bong
      10
    • Bowl
      3
    • Vaporizer
      2
    • Apple/ gravity bong or other homemade device
      1


Recommended Posts

After seeing there are quite a few smokers ( and former smokers) on thus forum I though this would be a pretty intresting topic.. I wanna know what you ppl like smoking out of the best.. For me it's gotta be a bong, although I enjoy smoking out of any device :) ... But there's nothing better than a huge bong rip after a long day if work !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...for me, the quality of the consumable dictates how it is consumed. I would love to be able to get the Kind all the time, but sometimes finances dont allow it. But I try to keep a minimum requirement for the quality, I have become a snob when it comes to the herb. I will go without before I blaze some of the what my bro-in-law smokes. I will pay for quality over quantity every day... I want a vaporizer, just havent seen one for less than $500, and I am not willing to spend that on my habit..er, not on a utensil for my habit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...