Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting conversation this week...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Seeing as how that you are oblivious to most that goes on around you, that doesn't involve brown nosing, nut hugging, and slurping everything Fox anyway, that doesn't surprise me one little bit.

I like your spunk little one. :cheers2:

Spunk- slang for semen, a colloquial for ejaculate.

And you promised you wouldn't tell anyone how much you liked it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the topic, no matter how Moore practiced he should have been the starter if he gave us the best chance to win. The object of football is to win, not to have a passionate quarterback, or a laid back one. And if you wanna argue Moore didn't prove he could win based on his effort than fine, Feeley or Cantwell should have been starting. But either way Jake was not winning and was having a horrible season so he should have been benched. End of story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for anyone who wants to discuss what Jake has done previously a direct quote from Jake: "We're a two-week business. You're good for two weeks; you're great. You're bad for two weeks; you're lower than you-know-what. That's kind of the way it goes," Delhomme said. "But certainly it hasn't been good this year for me." Now in a "two-week business" why was Jake still the starter after playing horrible for a lot more than two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...