Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monday Presser


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2023/01/12/will-the-panthers-hire-steve-wilks-it-may-depends-on-eagles-qb-coach/51181601/

 

I remember person reporting it as well so I will try and find that link.  Or maybe it was fowler

Yes it was Brian Johnson, but he got promoted to the Eagles OC so I am not sure he would have taken the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

The other week he called a play for Thielen who was in the tent, sounds like to me he’s so occupied with calling plays he has no clue on his personnel.

So if you aren’t going to be handing over play calling you at least need one of your assistants tracking personnel for you. 
 

Multiple times he’s said that him, brown and Frazier are collaborating for each play. Too busy arguing what they are going to run instead of changing personnel

Then this explains why Bryce is racing the play clock on just about every snap. Plays must not be coming in fast enough due to this “collaboration” in the headsets.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more Frank talks, the more he makes a fool of himself. He really has no idea what is going on with his team. He keeps selling to the media that he has been around teams that have turned it around, the thing is that he hasn't been on a turnaround team as the HC! Frank is clearly the problem and holding this team back. 

At the same time, I don't get the Huddle. Everyone wants Tepper to fire Fitt and Reich, but when Tepper is involved with football decisions, then he meddles too much? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

The other week he called a play for Thielen who was in the tent, sounds like to me he’s so occupied with calling plays he has no clue on his personnel.

So if you aren’t going to be handing over play calling you at least need one of your assistants tracking personnel for you. 
 

Multiple times he’s said that him, brown and Frazier are collaborating for each play. Too busy arguing what they are going to run instead of changing personnel

Part of the reason plays get in with one second left on the clock.....real sh't show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Blamed the second INT on Mingo for not running his route at the right depth which is something I’ve said a few times is a massive issue of Mingo’s. So why on earth is TMJ sitting on the bench while Mingo is running around like a chicken with its head cutoff 

Because TMJ is a skinflint and reeks of fumble every time he touches the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Seriously what is reich talking about?  Young just didnt see the corner, thats clear.    Jacobs pulled off thomas because he was reading youngs eyes, bryce stared him down the whole play

I was there live. He literally stared at him from the snap. Anyone in the building knew where that ball was going.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Wouldn't you expect he should already have a grasp on this by now and it wouldn't have taken getting our ass blown off by Detroit in week 5 to figure it out?

Idiots on the huddle could figure going into the game a slow Cam no huddle would do Bryce wonders.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might help if Reich grew a backbone. Even Christ lost his temper a time or two 

id just say ‘

’you are the one who wanted Bryce, not me, so if you don’t like the dinner i make with the groceries you bought, fire me  and find another chef ‘


lets remember, too,it’s not like Young is any threat to run, add that to shitty oline play and scheme and here we are. …and the RG’s return isn’t going to be the savior 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...