Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brock Purdy and Bryce Young

tukafan21

By tukafan21,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BrisbanePanther Mentor

BrisbanePanther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

Watching the 49ers is enough to make me sick 

this franchise just can’t have nice things 

They have just been a smarter franchise overall, no matter what they have done.

Let's see, they make Shanahan coach--and don't fire him when they have rocky seasons.

They put John Lynch in the front office--who I believe didn't have much or any experience when they did so.

Oh, and they traded a ton to draft Lance...and you wouldn't even know it.

How good are they? McDaniel, Ryans, and Slowik come from their system. Not bad.

FWIW, the other SF franchises--Warriors and Giants--are overall in good shape too. They're just smarter out there when it comes to sports. 

All of Charlotte's teams have been owned and run by people who can make a bunch of money from an asset, but can't make that asset work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newtcase Experienced

Newtcase

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SCO96 said:

Shanahan is a master play caller and play designer. That TD to FB was the 2nd time that play has been called tonight. Both times he was wide open in the flat on the play-action pass. Why don’t we have something like this in our playbook?

 

2 hours ago, countryboi said:

Young would kill in Shanahan's system, but this post doesn't make sense. 

Yeah that’s why Garoppolo and Lance were clearly just tits.  Not saying Shanahan isn’t top tier coaching but stop stripping Purdy of his due credit just because you need to make excuses for Bryce.  Purdy got two other higher pedigree guys shipped outta town fast, full stop.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newtcase Experienced

Newtcase

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Purdy would look terrible on this team

Who else would look bad?  Mahommes?  Allen?  Hurts?

Do you just categorically think anyone except Dalton vs Seattle would look bad?

Just curious why you decided to state Purdy specifically would look bad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Mentor

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Andy looked good 2 weeks ago 

 

20 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

Who else would look bad?  Mahommes?  Allen?  Hurts?

Do you just categorically think anyone except Dalton vs Seattle would look bad?

Just curious why you decided to state Purdy specifically would look bad.

 

We got blown out and Dalton put up some garbage time numbers while having nearly 60 attempts 

 

Nothing about Purdy says he would do good on a bad team 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Newtcase said:

Who else would look bad?  Mahommes?  Allen?  Hurts?

Do you just categorically think anyone except Dalton vs Seattle would look bad?

Just curious why you decided to state Purdy specifically would look bad.

 

He's similar to Bryce IMO in that he needs to be in the perfect system with top tier surrounding talent. What he's shown that Bryce hasn't so far is elite anticipation and ball placement. But put him in this system with this surrounding talent and he probably looks about like Bryce. Put Bryce in SF and he probably looks about like Purdy. What chaps my ass is that when you're looking at a prospect who has to be brilliant between the ears to make up for what he lacks physically, that's a late round draft pick because everything is going to have to fit together perfectly to make this work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceBoogie Veteran

AceBoogie

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Similar arm strength but the big difference is that Purdy has absolutely elite anticipation and ball placement where so far Bryce has looked pretty average in those categories too. I didn't expect that. I really expected Bryce to be the type of QB who could throw guys open with anticipation and ball placement while hitting them in stride to allow for maximum YAC. That just hasn't been the case as of yet.

Purdy can’t complete any throws that aren’t wide open windows. He has an embarrassment of riches around him. This is the same system that once made Jimmy G the highest paid player in NFL history. We won’t find out how good Purdy is until he gets off that contract and the talent around him shrinks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

Purdy can’t complete any throws that aren’t wide open windows. He has an embarrassment of riches around him. This is the same system that once made Jimmy G the highest paid player in NFL history. We won’t find out how good Purdy is until he gets off that contract and the talent around him shrinks. 

You're not watching and that's causing you to completely embarrass yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceBoogie Veteran

AceBoogie

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not watching and that's causing you to completely embarrass yourself. 

I gamble bro. Trust me I’m watching everything. Pull up one of those charts again. Brock is throwing to wide open targets and beautifully designed screens. Kudos to him for executing, but you could plug a lot of guys into that offense. Clean pockets, dynamic playmakers, offensive genius calling plays. He’s playing a different position out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceBoogie Veteran

AceBoogie

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Newtcase said:

Who else would look bad?  Mahommes?  Allen?  Hurts?

Do you just categorically think anyone except Dalton vs Seattle would look bad?

Just curious why you decided to state Purdy specifically would look bad.

 

Josh Allen would have to run a lot more on this team and would find some success. Same with Jalen. You’d probably see a lot more read option stuff with those guys. 
 

Pat wouldn’t let Frank call the shitty ass plays. Would probably just take over the offense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

I gamble bro. Trust me I’m watching everything. Pull up one of those charts again. Brock is throwing to wide open targets and beautifully designed screens. Kudos to him for executing, but you could plug a lot of guys into that offense. Clean pockets, dynamic playmakers, offensive genius calling plays. He’s playing a different position out there. 

Watch the game last night and honestly try to argue that all Purdy did was throw to wide open targets.

Yeah, their scheme is way better than ours. Yeah, their weapons are way better than ours. But Purdy made at least 10 high level throws with elite anticipation and ball placement. The type of throws that Bryce has been just a hair late on or the ball has been just off enough on to allow the defender to make a play. Not bad throws, just not quite good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...