Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TMJ in trade talks?

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WhoKnows Grand Master

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He didn't look that good last year. He is a bum.

I don’t know why people keep saying that. He got loose (probably forgotten or DC said don’t worry about him) on a couple long passes but we finished 4-2 and he averaged something like 2 catches for 20 yards each game, basically not contributing to the wins.

Devin Funchess’ was far more valuable and contributed way more than TMJ has so far.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lurk21 Mentor

Lurk21

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, CRA said:

10 targets, 9 receptions last week 

0 snaps this week 

https://x.com/scott_fowler/status/1711140012249493594?s=46&t=f55N0zsNFevD-XGJBWj1-A
 

The Panthers might be looking to lessen the draft assets needed  to get a Jerry Juedy type by including TMJ in the trade??

The only connection I see is remembering  the Saints were high on him as all LSU players have been heavily vetted by the saints over the years.  Therefore Sean and his ego may see something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I would have to imagine we would have to trade a draft pick away + tmj just to get rid of him. There is no way in hell any other team in the NFL wants that bum

Strongly disagree there

He's a non guaranteed $1.4 million next year, I think that is actually very attractive to teams out there who would be interested in seeing if he's just been cursed by this terrible franchise not being able to develop any players the last few years.

You get a guy who has shown flashes of ability, on a cheap contract, and out to prove he's better than he's shown to get a new deal.

That's why I think he'd be someone the Bengals would be interested in with him having played at LSU with Burrow and Chase.  They know they're losing Higgins after this year, trade us Higgins, a 1st, and a 3rd for Burns and TMJ.  

If anyone is going to unlock him, it's going to be putting him back with Burrow and Chase, then they also get him on the cheap for next year if it works out, if not, they can cut him at no cost.

My only fear would be that Higgins would end up refusing to sign an extension here because of Bryce.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrisbanePanther Mentor

BrisbanePanther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ThrillzforthePils said:

Had high hopes for him after flashing last year.  He has been awful and it’s not coaching or scheme related—dude can’t seem to catch or hold onto the ball

There are way too many players that we do this for. If we evaluated ALL players from the beginning like we're doing Bryce this year, maybe we're not in the position that we're in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, PantherPhann89 said:

I think coaching has heck of a lot to do with our players stats. Theilen is our only WR that creates some separation and that's not because he's being coached well, it's because he's already been coached well.

I think it's largely because he is the only good WR on the roster. It isn't a coaching issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Strongly disagree there

He's a non guaranteed $1.4 million next year, I think that is actually very attractive to teams out there who would be interested in seeing if he's just been cursed by this terrible franchise not being able to develop any players the last few years.

You get a guy who has shown flashes of ability, on a cheap contract, and out to prove he's better than he's shown to get a new deal.

That's why I think he'd be someone the Bengals would be interested in with him having played at LSU with Burrow and Chase.  They know they're losing Higgins after this year, trade us Higgins, a 1st, and a 3rd for Burns and TMJ.  

If anyone is going to unlock him, it's going to be putting him back with Burrow and Chase, then they also get him on the cheap for next year if it works out, if not, they can cut him at no cost.

My only fear would be that Higgins would end up refusing to sign an extension here because of Bryce.

Higgins a 1st and a 3rd for Burns and TMJ?

Bro, the Panthers brass works for the Panthers. We're the only team in the league dumb enough to do that deal. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...