Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steelers playing like the Panthers

HGG

By HGG,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

HGG Newbie

HGG

Posted
Posted

Slipping off the quarterback when you had him sacked. Can't tackle. Playing like they all of a sudden forgot how to play football.

They must know that so many are hoping they finish Dallas off today, because they are determined not to do it.

We'll see if they wake up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HGG Newbie

HGG

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cowboys are playing without their top 2 RBs and they've turned it over 4 times on the road against one of the best teams in the NFL. And they're winning by ten. :(

That's what happens when you're playing to lose, like the Steelers clearly are doing.

"Playing dumb" > "all of the factors in the game" EVERY TIME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
monstercat Newbie

monstercat

Posted
Posted

God I hate the Steelers. They haven't won a game I wanted them to win since the Chuck Knoll years.

BTW, Jake Delhomme hasn't been playing nearly as bad as Big Ben has lately. The only thing he has over Delhomme is his size, which makes him a little harder to sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HGG Newbie

HGG

Posted
  • Author
Posted

God I hate the Steelers. They haven't won a game I wanted them to win since the Chuck Knoll years.

That's what happens when you PLAY DUMB. Just ask the Panthers whenever they look bad. It's all DUMBNESS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...