Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football Week 6 Games


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Varking said:

Are you able to pick the four games or does it have to come from the sets they pick? Girlfriend was wondering this last week and I forgot to look it up. 

They don't let you pick if it's on ABC, CBS, or Fox it's either 1 screen or 4, and no in between. If the games on the other sports channels, you'll have an option of 2 screens, 3 screens or 4 screens usually. You don't get to pick it but they mix and match so much it's hard not to find at least 3 games you care about. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, OUCPFL said:

They don't let you pick if it's on ABC, CBS, or Fox it's either 1 screen or 4, and no in between. If the games on the other sports channels, you'll have an option of 2 screens, 3 screens or 4 screens usually. You don't get to pick it but they mix and match so much it's hard not to find at least 3 games you care about. 

Yeah I think we were in a scenario where we had 3 great games on one but it was missing the Notre Dame game or something so she was asking about the ability to pick and choose what showed up in the four boxes. Appreciate the heads up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

Yeah I think we were in a scenario where we had 3 great games on one but it was missing the Notre Dame game or something so she was asking about the ability to pick and choose what showed up in the four boxes. Appreciate the heads up!

A friend of mine told me they let you pick and chose on the ESPN App and it sucks. There is a ton of lag, and it's never consistent like YTTV. I think it's a rights thing when it comes to the local channels, that's why they don't let you do much besides 4 games they pick. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OUCPFL said:

A friend of mine told me they let you pick and chose on the ESPN App and it sucks. There is a ton of lag, and it's never consistent like YTTV. I think it's a rights thing when it comes to the local channels, that's why they don't let you do much besides 4 games they pick. 

I'll literally watch pirates streams over official ESPN streams. They're just better as embarrassing as that is for the self proclaimed World Wide Leader in Sports.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll literally watch pirates streams over official ESPN streams. They're just better as embarrassing as that is for the self proclaimed World Wide Leader in Sports.

Their broadcast teams on the ESPN+ streams are AWFUL. Then again, most of their broadcast teams are trash anyway. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OUCPFL said:

YTTV allows you to play 4 games at once on your screen now. It's worth it in my book. 

I'm usually running 4 streams on my second monitor with the game I'm most interested in on my primary.

I keep the third monitor open to look up stats, prospects, etc that I'm paying attention to or catch my eye.

My ADHD is in Heaven during football season. 😛

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Tez Walker and Nate McCollum are gonna feast.

Paysour and McCollum are both going to really benefit from having a true field stretcher out there. That was the big thing this offense was missing. Paysour is a big possession type guy. McCollum is a YAC guy. We just didn't have that guy who could blow the top off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...