Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The impressive throw you wanted from Bryce


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

And Tepper has done it multiple times now. He's clueless.

Dude was so cocky coming in. Wasn't gonna be no more of this mediocrity bullshit. There's gonna be all kinds of super smart analytics. Evidently the analytics didn't show that trading a king's ransom to draft a noodle armed QB the size of a HS freshman is a bad idea. Maybe scrap those analytics.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Just say you have no argument rather than try and tell me what to do

Yes. You were so, so right. After 3 games you have all of the information you need to declare one better than the other. I’m so, so glad you can sleep at night knowing that the guy you wanted has had a better 3 games. Validation granted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Along with whoever made the decision to trade up for Bryce Young. If it was Tepper then he really needs to swallow his ego and GTFO of all football decisions.

This isnt likely to happen for many years, if ever.  Bob Kraft micromanaged the poo outta his team.  It wasnt until an ugly split with Parcells and a failed stint with Pete Carroll that he realize he needed to get out of the way.  No guarantee Tepper ever has that revelation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Dude was so cocky coming in. Wasn't gonna be no more of this mediocrity bullshit. There's gonna be all kinds of super smart analytics. Evidently the analytics didn't show that trading a king's ransom to draft a noodle armed QB the size of a HS freshman is a bad idea. Maybe scrap those analytics.

Then the one time he tried to actively lose games (last year after firing Rhule), we actually started winning lmao

Dude needs to do the George Costanza thing where he just does the opposite of whatever his impulses are.

Edited by PNW_PantherMan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CBDellinger said:

This isnt likely to happen for many years, if ever.  Bob Kraft micromanaged the poo outta his team.  It wasnt until an ugly split with Parcells and a failed stint with Pete Carroll that he realize he needed to get out of the way.  No guarantee Tepper ever has that revelation.

This is the sad reality. These billionaire types aren't used to failing and are used to having final say on everything all the whole having minimal actual football experience. It's not a great combination for finding success on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Then the one time he tried to actively lose games (last year after firing Rhule), we actually started winning lmao

That Wilks wasn't retained betrays that getting a look at him as a potential HC was a farce. I mean, given the dramatic improvement under him if that was the actual case you would've given him the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

This is the sad reality. These billionaire types aren't used to failing and are used to having final say on everything all the whole having minimal actual football experience. It's not a great combination for finding success on the field.

They arent used to being told no and they tend to gravitate towards people that confirm their own bias.  When you are worth 20Bs, most of it in cash, you are always right!  "Look how right I am... count the zeros in my bank account!!  That ish is right as rain."  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That Wilks wasn't retained betrays that getting a look at him as a potential HC was a farce. I mean, given the dramatic improvement under him if that was the actual case you would've given him the job.

I was all for getting some hot shot OC to be our new head coach instead of Wilks.  But in hindsight, Tepper would have looked way better if he just kept Wilks.  Even if Wilks failed miserably this year, Tepper would have gotten the benefit of the doubt for going with the guy who actually got the team playing.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I was all for getting some hot shot OC to be our new head coach instead of Wilks.  But in hindsight, Tepper would have looked way better if he just kept Wilks.  Even if Wilks failed miserably this year, Tepper would have gotten the benefit of the doubt for going with the guy who actually got the team playing.

Yeah, if you were going to go the boring retread route you already had that in Wilks with the locker room behind him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, if you were going to go the boring retread route you already had that in Wilks with the locker room behind him.

When it came down to the final three, I was begging for Kellen Moore over the re-treads. At least he is in that group of modern NFL play callers, and he has the chargers offense looking pretty good. But what do I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CBDellinger said:

that is NFL open.  Should be a catch, DB may have grabbed a hand tho.  

I'm not arguing the ball should have been caught. Chark definitely could have definitely done better.

But... that is also a throw most QBs make. The elite ones are the ones that place it a step in front of him at the point of catch and only gives the WR a chance to catch it. I'm just saying if that is the impressive throw we have been waiting for from Bryce, then YIKES. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

When it came down to the final three, I was begging for Kellen Moore over the re-treads. At least he is in that group of modern NFL play callers, and he has the chargers offense looking pretty good. But what do I know.

Hindsight is always 20/20, but especially if you're drafting a QB that checks none of the physical boxes of the conventional prototypical NFL QB, then you definitely don't want to pair him with a HC that is going to run a largely traditional NFL offense. If you want to try to break the mold, then break the mold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...