Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Tepper is the worst owner in the NFL?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, mwa78 said:

That doesn’t even make sense. Sounds like something a 10 year old would say. About as original as your initial post on this thread. Any success/traffic this website currently has is in spite of you. That is obvious to everyone who frequents this site.

Are you as bad at your other job as you are running the site? I’d bet good money that you are. Loser…..

So leave 

don’t frequent the site 
this site wouldn’t exist without Zod

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I struggle to even call this husk of a team the "Panthers". It's really not the same team, everything feels so detached and foreign. I never thought I'd miss Richardson but damn, i'd rather be owned by a local Southern figure that cares about the area and that actually does things with and appreciates the fanbase instead of blatantly meddling in football ops 100x over than this travesty currently.   I propose we call them the Carolina Teppers moving forward, I think it's more fitting at this point than the Panthers moniker. The Teppers are a complete affront to everything the Carolina Panthers used to stand for, the antithesis of Keep Pounding. It makes me sick to see something I used to care about so dearly bought out and relegated to cellar dwellar status. One final assfuging from the good old NFL, I suppose. Add it to the pile, doubt we'll ever be recovering from this one though. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beo said:

I struggle to even call this husk of a team the "Panthers". It's really not the same team, everything feels so detached and foreign. I never thought I'd miss Richardson but damn, i'd rather be owned by a local Southern figure that cares about the area and that actually does things with and appreciates the fanbase instead of blatantly meddling in football ops 100x over than this travesty currently.   I propose we call them the Carolina Teppers moving forward, I think it's more fitting at this point than the Panthers moniker. The Teppers are a complete affront to everything the Carolina Panthers used to stand for, the antithesis of Keep Pounding. It makes me sick to see something I used to care about so dearly bought out and relegated to cellar dwellar status. One final assfuging from the good old NFL, I suppose. Add it to the pile, doubt we'll ever be recovering from this one though. 

I didn’t watch today, just drove home from a trip, took a nap and will enjoy my day regardless. It’s like they don’t exist anymore, and I’m better off operating that way. 

  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I didn’t watch today, just drove home from a trip, took a nap and will enjoy my day regardless. It’s like they don’t exist anymore, and I’m better off operating that way. 

Exact same dude, I just check the score and browse the huddle a bit after games for the most part these days. I missed 1 game from the day I first became a fan up to 2018, I'd have never even considered missing games up till recent years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper is a fuggin slimeball. This is what I feared when Ben Navarro's name was out as a candidate. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING he has done since coming here has been a failure. His ego and meddling has fugged this franchise so hard. I hope his soccer team stumbles hard too (which I've heard it has). Makes you really miss JR.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There are very few players in this draft that don't have a concern that could cause someone to not like them---I think the longer a player hangs around the top 10 (beginning in February) the more their flaws could withstand the scrutiny. Some fall too far, in my opinion, and are thrown into the scratch and dent bin.  Jack Sawyer (Ohio State) comes to mind, Shavon Revel (East Carolina), Restrepo (Miami).  I wonder if it is not that we found things through research, it could be that we exploited trivial things.  You can't measure the "it" factor. Those three just mentioned--I would have no problem drafting them at a discount.  Restrepo ran a 4.8--not as big a deal as people think--he is going to be a chain-moving slot--he will be sliding underneath, finding a hole in the zone, etc.  Great hands, great attitude.  I take him in the fourth.  Jack Sawyer is the high motor over-achiever.  I think he can be a 8-10 sack guy, block a lot of passes, and hold the edge.  I take him in round 3 if they let him fall that far.  Revel could be one of the top 3 CBs--if he is there at 58, I take him.  When the flaw is what you see when you hear their names, you are blind to their other talents.
    • Sims has to do a little outrage marketing to make the engagement numbers go vroom, but there's been a few analysts that have commented on how Walker is ultimately going to be depending on whomever drafts him to properly develop him. Whether that's starting him off of as a rotational edge guy on obvious passing downs or settling him at ILB will be up to whoever ends up with him. A lot of folks like to point out Isaiah Simmons, and as much as I like Isaiah as a Clemson fan he's not the guy that Jalon Walker is between the ears (this isn't to say Isaiah isn't bright, but didn't seem to breathe football like Jalon does). The kid's got a shot; he's just going to need it somewhere that's going to aim first before firing him off.
    • Evero runs Vic Fangio's scheme and leans heavily on cover 4 with disguised coverages. It is not predominantly cover-2 as suggested. This means that the box safety is going to likely be covering 1/4th as opposed to 1/2 of the field. Whomever the team brings in to be the boundary safety (unless they stay with Demani) is going to be covering the 1/2 part. Though with Evero's scheme, that box safety can also be one of the three underneath coverage guys depending on how they've got it disguised prior to the snap.
×
×
  • Create New...