Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Help Me!!! Fashion Question!


Cat

Recommended Posts

OK so NYE going out in a short cocktail dress which is likely all black. It's freakin cold outside so as much as I hate hose I think I should wear some to stay a bit warmer.

Are hose totally unattractive?

Should I wear black hose? black hose with cute designs? black thigh highs? or skin colored hose? Or no hose at all?

Its also our 9 year wedding anniversary so i want to look hawt for my man.

Ok maybe this isn't the best place for a fashion question but then again I'd like to hear some guys opinions. Please help, i've looked for advice all over the net and haven't found any great insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

General rule is sheer black or nude for really dressy black dresses. Some you can wear darker or tights. If the dress in plain ( no patterns) then by all means get some sheer black with small design work. Are you wearing boots or closed toe shoes? If you wear opened toed shoes you need to get the type that do not cover the toe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you wear opened toed shoes you need to get the type that do not cover the toe.

They have those!!!! I have some super awesome open toed high heels but figured I couldn't wear them with hose. I wonder if they have thigh high's that don't cover the toe.

Being a woman is too complicated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rofl: thanks though

I'm thinking showing off the tops of my thigh highs in a restaurant would be considered slutty...no? :D

no-- :D

not to your man, and he is the only one who matters right??

Us men like to see our women "slut it up" every now and then... We just cant go out and get any hooker, so you going super sexy on him will get him very excited :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...