Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football - Week 5


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, OUCPFL said:

It'll effect them in the CFP rankings as well. You can't continue to struggle win vs meager opponents and not get docked for it. 

Plus, USC will lose to Oregon, Washington, hell maybe even another team because of that atrocious defense. Their schedule down the road is brutal. 

But ultimately it doesn’t matter. You have to make the playoffs to win a championship. Doing your job and winning will get you in. Don’t lose. Control your own destiny and then pretty points won’t matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

But ultimately it doesn’t matter. You have to make the playoffs to win a championship. Doing your job and winning will get you in. Don’t lose. Control your own destiny and then pretty points won’t matter. 

But if you're winning by a meager margin as FSU showed the year after winning the Natty, you'll get docked as you'll finish 3rd or 4th in the Playoff. Which results in a tougher opponent. That's why FSU got murdered by Oregon. This year it might not matter, as there isn't a true definitively great team. But maybe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, early season polls are crucial. 😂

The pollsters are still trying to figure out where everyone stacks up. Everyone knows a Lincoln Riley team is going to be all offense and no defense. They always have been. What is new about this?

Now you're moving the goalposts. I asked if it didn't matter, then why would they move up and down the polls when they have struggle wins. Why would teams start out low in the CFP if they're undefeated? Now you're talking about Riley's offense and defense. Alright man. This has been a pleasure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OUCPFL said:

But if you're winning by a meager margin as FSU showed the year after winning the Natty, you'll get docked as you'll finish 3rd or 4th in the Playoff. Which results in a tougher opponent. That's why FSU got murdered by Oregon. This year it might not matter, as there isn't a true definitively great team. But maybe. 

But it doesn’t matter. If you are a National Championship caliber team you will have to face 2 of the 4 best teams in the league to win in. And again, it won’t matter if you win by 6 or 60. You can be the National Champ with the lowest point differential in history but you’d still be a national champion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He won't last long. He never does. He's been banned multiple times already. He'll make an egregious personal attack soon and get bounced again. He never learns.

Ha. I've been here over a few months now. Haven't seemed to attack anyone personally. I usually don't take the internet posters serious. 

Hell, this place is losing traffic by the day anyway because of how bad the Panthers are.

I recall when CFB threads weren't even a thing on the main Forum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

But it doesn’t matter. If you are a National Championship caliber team you will have to face 2 of the 4 best teams in the league to win in. And again, it won’t matter if you win by 6 or 60. You can be the National Champ with the lowest point differential in history but you’d still be a national champion. 

Sure. But usually if you're beating the Colorado's of the world by 7 points when you're favored by 25. You'll get schooled by a good-great team eventually. I've seen it way too many times. 

Edited by OUCPFL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when they randomly made Tennessee #1 for a week last season the week they were going to play Georgia? Then they lost to Georgia and it didn’t matter that they spent a week as the #1 team? Georgia should never have not been #1 but that’s what pollsters do. Ultimately UGA won a national championship and Tennessee didn’t make the playoff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OUCPFL said:

Now you're moving the goalposts. I asked if it didn't matter, then why would they move up and down the polls when they have struggle wins. Why would teams start out low in the CFP if they're undefeated? Now you're talking about Riley's offense and defense. Alright man. This has been a pleasure. 

You claim to be such a college football expert but seem utterly ignorant of the reality that early season polls always fluctuate significantly. Maybe USC will slip a spot or two for the final score being close against Colorado even though the majority of the game wasn't competitive. Maybe they would've bumped up a spot or two of they had held onto a blowout margin. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter. A sport or two difference in an early October poll is irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OUCPFL said:

Sure. But usually if you're beating the Colorado's of the world by 7 points when you're favored by 25. You'll get schooled by a good-great team eventually. 

That’s why you play the games. Sometimes a UGA loses to a South Carolina team that’s not ranked and then they run the table. But you’d think if they lose to an unranked team than surely they will lose to the harder teams…. But then they didn’t. 

Edited by Varking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You claim to be such a college football expert but seem utterly ignorant of the reality that early season polls always fluctuate significantly. Maybe USC will slip a spot or two for the final score being close against Colorado even though the majority of the game wasn't competitive. Maybe they would've bumped up a spot or two of they had held onto a blowout margin. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter. A sport or two difference in an early October poll is irrelevant.

USC isn’t even going to drop. If they do it’ll be a spot. 11 struggled and 10 lost. How far are you dropping USC for winning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and he succeeded at an even higher level in LA with an even better surrounding cast. Goff is a guy that isn't really able to dramatically elevate players around him but he can make a good situation even better. He is capable of that. Some QB's aren't. I am not sure Dak is able to do that and he is in a similar "class" as Goff, IMO.
    • i think i could handle that for a year. beyond that....i don't know.  back where we lived, when we had a few inches of snow, it might have been a couple feet because we weren't getting out and doing anything. i remember times where power would go out for days on end. we had propane and electric heat, depending on the floor. basement (had a couple bedrooms and a living room and kitchen down there) and main floor had gas logs. main floor gas logs was enough to take care of the upstairs, so we could stay warm and cook on the grill when we needed. we had a well so that was always an issue when the power went out. had to make sure tubs were filled with water for the toilets and we had gallons of water for drinking and cooking available. always had to make sure we were ready. that wasn't always the case. we had a couple moments where we were going through propane quickly and because we were dealing with the worst propane company in the world (amerigas) they wouldn't get out to put gas in our 900 gallon tank. made for some nerve racking moments.  i know y'all were probably a lot more able to handle that kind of thing, but after the little bit (comparatively) that we got here i just have no desire to get trapped again. maybe for a day or two a year get snowed in and i'm good.
    • I think he is just drawing a DC to them line and that's about as far as his thought process went. It makes almost no sense outside of that. Also, it doesn't make sense for Pittsburgh or Seattle at this juncture either.  I think our "veteran" pool is basically gonna be the Dalton/Flacco tier or the "pick your poison" options of young busts(Jones/Z. Wilson) or wild, TO prone gunslingers(Darnold/Winston/etc). We have the option to pursue I genuinely believe(depending on the way the rest of this season goes), we either draft a QB in the top 10 or resign Dalton. Outlier third option on taking one of the wild gunslingers that Dave feels like he can work with.
×
×
  • Create New...