Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Team Has Been Hamstrung for Several Years


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

KB and Funchess were trash, especially Funchess. KB was good(ish) his rookie year but doodoo after that and his absence was a benefit on a team that had to start Ginn and Cotchery in his place…

KB is going to always be one of those what ifs. Everyone reacts differently to grief and combined with the knee injury, the guy just imploded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Evil Hurney said:

Interesting take. While I do generally agree that better drafting would generate more depth and a better overall team I wanted to compare to the other teams in the league to see if the data supports that claim.

Carolina vs the NFL

To be as objective as possible I used the "DrAV" metric from PFR to determine if a player was a "contributor". To qualify as a contributor, a player's DrAV had to meet or exceed the median DrAV from their draft class. Re-stated, if a player was in the upper half of their class, they were counted as a "contributor" for the team that drafted them. I'll admit there is probably a better way to do this, I just wanted something quick.

Since it took a bit to scrape this all together, I only went back as far as 2016. I also calculated the hit rate for each team or # contributors / # picks. Here are those results.

image.png.54bca518732f8e45726862d80f3a060c.png

My takeaway is that, over the time span I looked at, the Panthers are slightly below average in terms of finding contributors in the draft. Their 43% rate is just below the league average of 45%. Surprisingly, Philidelphia actually has a lower contribution rate from their draft picks (40% overall); if anything, that should give us all hope that drafting isn't everything to a team's success.

I also found it interesting that our NFC south foes have all done a better job of finding contributors in the draft: ATL at a whopping 63% clip, NO at 56%, and TB at 53%.

Carolina GMs

For those interested I also zoomed in on the Panthers and broke things down by GM; It's crazy that we have had 3 in such a short time period. The percentages shown are the hit rate.

image.png.644f90af69e3d7d3eabf97382629b6f7.png

My takeaway here is that the jury is still out on Fitterer. Despite the lack of star power, his 2021 draft did end up producing a decent amount of value for the team. His 2022 draft on the other hand was rough. How much of that is him vs Rhule vs the new coaching staff wanting different players is hard to tell. Note that I am not interested in looking at the 2023 draft until after the season.

And this is why most stats are useless. The eye test says our drafts have been less than average for a long time.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, amcoolio said:

As much as I had high hopes for Mingo, he does not look promising. How do you quit on routes this early in your NFL career. I really thought he was going to be the next DK Metcaf/AJ Brown/Amon Ra type player that we needed. I know its only game three, hopefully he improves

I have more hope in Mingo than I ever had in Terrace Marshall. I called Terrace Marshall "Dwayne Jarrett" after his first season and got like 20 poos on that post. 

The problem with our fanbase is that we aren't more critical of stupid decisions. We could have drafted Levis at number 1 and the board would have been like "hey let's give this guy a shot, you're being too hard on him" when clearly, he is garbage. 

Our fans buy into the hype too much then freak out when that player turns out to be trash. We took Bryce and it's pretty clear he isn't the game changer he was hyped up to be and people are freaking out or making up excuses for him. Can he be a good QB? maybe, but everything we know so far points to no. 

We are too nice of a fanbase and 80% of them don't want to part with players because they think they are cool or "seem like nice guys".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BIGH2001 said:

And this is why most stats are useless. The eye test says our drafts have been less than average for a long time.

How can anyone say our 2021 was 6 contributors? Just because our team was so gutted in 2020 (Cam, Luke, Bradberry, Irvin and tons more vets left) that we are forced to start guys from the 2020 and 2021 draft doesn’t mean it was a good draft. Don’t forget we were the 8th pick so we were at the 1st quarter of each round on average.

Horn

Marshall

Christensen

Tremble

Hubbard

Nixon

Brown

Smith

LS

Phil whatever

Basically, our best player was pick 8 and has already missed more than half his games. The rest are forced starters, who are well below average because we don’t have better, and garbage. A good draft is not pick 8 playing 1 out his first 3 years, a backup RB and a below average LG.

KC rebuilt their OL in the 2021 draft such that they won a SB and our draft looks twice as good as ours. They traded for Orlando Brown with their first and they got the best young C in the game, maybe even the best C overall. I’d rather have Humphrey and Tre Smith to anchor our OL at C/RG than our entire draft.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Evil Hurney said:

Interesting take. While I do generally agree that better drafting would generate more depth and a better overall team I wanted to compare to the other teams in the league to see if the data supports that claim.

Carolina vs the NFL

To be as objective as possible I used the "DrAV" metric from PFR to determine if a player was a "contributor". To qualify as a contributor, a player's DrAV had to meet or exceed the median DrAV from their draft class. Re-stated, if a player was in the upper half of their class, they were counted as a "contributor" for the team that drafted them. I'll admit there is probably a better way to do this, I just wanted something quick.

Since it took a bit to scrape this all together, I only went back as far as 2016. I also calculated the hit rate for each team or # contributors / # picks. Here are those results.

image.png.54bca518732f8e45726862d80f3a060c.png

My takeaway is that, over the time span I looked at, the Panthers are slightly below average in terms of finding contributors in the draft. Their 43% rate is just below the league average of 45%. Surprisingly, Philidelphia actually has a lower contribution rate from their draft picks (40% overall); if anything, that should give us all hope that drafting isn't everything to a team's success.

I also found it interesting that our NFC south foes have all done a better job of finding contributors in the draft: ATL at a whopping 63% clip, NO at 56%, and TB at 53%.

Carolina GMs

For those interested I also zoomed in on the Panthers and broke things down by GM; It's crazy that we have had 3 in such a short time period. The percentages shown are the hit rate.

image.png.644f90af69e3d7d3eabf97382629b6f7.png

My takeaway here is that the jury is still out on Fitterer. Despite the lack of star power, his 2021 draft did end up producing a decent amount of value for the team. His 2022 draft on the other hand was rough. How much of that is him vs Rhule vs the new coaching staff wanting different players is hard to tell. Note that I am not interested in looking at the 2023 draft until after the season.

I mean this really means nothing tbh.  While our draft classes may land a "hit" on this spreadsheet, calling our 43% vs KC 49% only a 6% difference is ludicrous.  Patrick Mahommes counts for the same hit % as any single player counted for us.  Those things are not equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2023 at 10:29 AM, amcoolio said:

As much as I had high hopes for Mingo, he does not look promising. How do you quit on routes this early in your NFL career. I really thought he was going to be the next DK Metcaf/AJ Brown/Amon Ra type player that we needed. I know its only game three, hopefully he improves

I said it at the time, why the hell are we taking a wide out in the second? only one has EVER worked out for us. Same with edge rusher. We need to focus on draft interior lineman on both sides in the second round b/c the upper portion of the talent is still up there. Wide receivers are the one's who aren't first rounders and have a lot of red flags. In the future, if we draft a WR, if you haven't figured it out, he will be a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...