Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

let's relive the highlights of cutler to chicago thread & how bad of an actor Fiz is


Fiz

how should i kill myself  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. how should i kill myself

    • pills
      2147483648
    • gunshot
      2147483651
    • hanging
      2147483649
    • drowning
      2147483647
    • self immolation
      2147483648
    • seppuku
      2147483650
    • driving a car off a cliff with a hedgehog in my lap
      2147483657
    • poison
      2147483647
    • flog myself
      2147483649
    • read an akpantherfan thread
      40


Recommended Posts

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/10356-jay-cutler-is-a-bear.html

hahahahahahaaaaaaaaa!!!!!! Suck on THAT beetches!!!!!! :lol:

:lol:

Who wants overpriced first round picks??

Kyle Orton = Jay Cutler

This pickup, no matter what all of the haters say, does make the Bears an automatic contender. You can't stack the box with 8 waiting on Forte anymore, because YES a QB does make a WR better when he's throwing it where the ball needs to be, and the Bears do have options to throw to. I expect Hester to continue to grow in his role at WR, as he was doing at the end of the year, and Cutler has one of the best TE tandems in the league to throw to (a QBs security blanket) as well as a young WR that he already built a rapport with in college (Earl Bennett). With the Bears fortifying the O Line, as well, the Bears offense will be much more potent than those of yesteryears. Cutler threw for some 4500 yards last year and the Bears most passing yards we've ever had was 3800ish by Erik Kramer in the 90's. So, yes, this is a great pickup.

Cutler, Forte, Olsen, and Hester all young guys coming around at the same time could make for a grouping that goes down in Bears history

they're going down in history alright

also what are the bears going to do about their defense now?

everyone is either old, injured, terrible, or named lance briggs.

profilepic305_1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what?

ryne robinson was on a meteoric rise to stardom that was derailed by his acl injury

actually all those threads were tongue in cheek but i can't really say that now without losing face so ahead with the shtick i go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...