Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

matt moore lovers..is he that good????


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

ok matt moore performed great last week,as a fan i m all for it. but i m seeing fans of the kid come out of the wood works like hes the chosen one. i hope he is the answer but im not selling the farm for him at this point. lets not forget last weeks performance and most of the vikings game the offense looked awful. i m not stating he isnt the future but i still think we should bring in and draft a qb. i just think now we can afford to take a wr in the second and wait on a qb later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure who this is addressed to, I have not seen any folks being unrealistic about Moore.

This is exactly what I was thinking. Matt has done a decent job so far but he will have to keep improving to become what we need in a QB. The only thing I have seen on here is people who have faith that maybe he can be the guy in time and they feel he should be given a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he's the "Savior" , as if we win a superbowl with him.

I am sure that so far and most likely he will be, Far more entertaining to watch than a QB that has had Tommy_John_surgery who seemed to be okay for awhile, but now his only good attribute, (accurate throws) is a thing of the past.

I don't Hate Jake! However I must admit watching him play this year has been the most painful single thing I can remember in football.

I enjoyed watching Matt Moore than Jake even in the lose.

Fresh is always better than rotten, I'm sure even Jake would agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for the haters, anyone saying he's doing pretty well and shows some promise = crowning him the next peyton manning.

could be said for just about any player, though.

It cuts both ways. Moore haters are lined up to diminish what he has done, and Jake haters are crowning him as awesome. Most fans here are more middle of the road which is that he has had a good start but it has been rocky at times and he needs to improve. For me he is 2-1 which is all that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thge one thing I don't see on this board is the expectations of a QB from the draft. Sure, Matt will improve as time goes along. While drafting a QB may be a good idea, he will not be the franchise QB for several years. Peyton Manning wads 1-15 his 1st year starting, right now Matt is 4-2. I convinced that matt should be given the opportunity to be the starter for 2010. He's shown a lot of promise and we as fans have to understand he will have good games and bad games, but if we stay behind him we may see the QB develop that we have all wanted. As of today he is our best option to win by far, so let's give him the chance that was given to Jake, you may be happy you did. We don't need a superstar, just a good solid above average QB that handles all situations well.

Best Wishes and Happy Holidays to all on the Huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thge one thing I don't see on this board is the expectations of a QB from the draft. Sure, Matt will improve as time goes along. While drafting a QB may be a good idea, he will not be the franchise QB for several years. Peyton Manning wads 1-15 his 1st year starting, right now Matt is 4-2. I convinced that matt should be given the opportunity to be the starter for 2010. He's shown a lot of promise and we as fans have to understand he will have good games and bad games, but if we stay behind him we may see the QB develop that we have all wanted. As of today he is our best option to win by far, so let's give him the chance that was given to Jake, you may be happy you did. We don't need a superstar, just a good solid above average QB that handles all situations well.

Best Wishes and Happy Holidays to all on the Huddle.

He deserves to start for the last 2 games. Whether he deserves to start in 2010 will be based on who we have next year. There is no guarantee we will even resign Moore given he will be a restricted free agent. People criticize Fox for determining the starter before the season starts and yet people are doing that with Moore. Lets see what happens in the offseason and then lobby for the starters then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I'm not religious. I don't care that he is. It has no impact on whether or not he will succeed as a head coach in the NFL. If he doesn't work out here so be it. I'm not wasting keystrokes going off on tangents about his personal life. If I were that deeply invested to that point I wouldn't even be following sports at all. Clearly for whatever reason you do as the previous threads you have created eviscerating Dave Canales over that and his personal life would clearly indicate. But that's your prerogative.
    • The approach we took to build the WR room is one I will always be miffed by. I’ve never liked our draft choices and it always leaves me feeling uneasy (even back to LaFell/Gettis/Armanti). I loved Pearsall and Ladd, but those just aren’t types we target for some reason. RB wise - Just seeing what Bucky Irving has done this year with guys Canales’ built his offense around last year, is enough to really make the RB approach seem questionable.  If we were unsure about Chuba preseason, then we should’ve gotten a guy who could’ve played immediately. If we were confident in Chuba, then we should’ve targeted a Ray Davis, Irving, Tracy, Guerendo etc a bit later and reserve the R2 capital for a potential long term starter.  The reasoning doesn’t entirely check out even though I love Brooks as a prospect.  I dunno, just still feels off. Same taste I got with the Horn pick. Same with bringing back Hurney. Just a big old ick.
×
×
  • Create New...