Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Root of all the offensive woes


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, NAS said:

This team can’t run the ball

How did we go from putting up monster numbers with virtually the same offensive line and assistant coach. Is there something wrong with the scheme or is it the players not getting the push they need?

No QB can compete in the NFL if you’re forced to be one dimensional.

We got suckered into trading CMC for a bag of beans and then got suckered into taking Sanders without wondering why the Eagles would just let their starting RB go without much fuss or bother...

We are suckers. All day suckers.

Vacuum Cleaner Sucker GIF by Design Museum Gent

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Jmac said:

They screwed the pooch with Sanders. Wilks used C.Mayes as a full back for Foreman and Hubbard. It really helped the Oline out. gave the backs the lead blocking they needed. Trying to fix something that wasn't broken is the first mistake. Wilks would run first and establish the run to facilitate the pass.

They blew the whole thing up and killed the running game. Killed the running game, while choosing a rookie QB at #1.....with no running game.

One stupid move after another

 

 

 

And then they hired Reich instead of Wilks...

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest problem with the Panthers starts with the head coach. His scheme is very complicated with how the play is called with pre-snaps and audibles to confuse the defense. The problem with that is it creates confusion, then the vanilla routes the WRs run dont create bust plays for the defense (eventhough it was one today). Then Frank uses the wrong players and the wrong plays for situations. 

And one of the biggest issues are the things he dont take advantage of like Hurry Up Offense, No huddle, two TE sets, I-formation, exotic plays, and end-around. He reminds me off coaches that have their favorites and won't play the players that need to be playing. Very stubborn 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Frank is calling plays for players he doesn't have. 

Namely an early down RB, a possession boundary WR and a legit second option at TE.

Crazy...all three of those I was begging for during preseason.  We have the cap space. Heck, a decent RB can be had for peanuts.  Sanders is a 3rd down back.  Chuba is mischaracterized as our power back. The TMJ experiment is OVER.  The Ian Thomas experiment is OVER.  Trying to turn Chuba Hubbard into Jerome Bettis isn't going to work.

Penalties can be cleaned up, but these are key components of our offense that have JAGs there.  We need upgrades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yo, just saw we play the Vikings next week.  We are going to light up the scoreboard to have any chance.  Bryce need to sit this one out too.  Make sure that ankle is fully healed up and all.  Our defense isn't slowing Cousins and Jefferson down.  Calling it now, the team to post 40+ points wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reich is guilty of the same thing Rivera was: He has some preconceived notion about seniority when a guy isn't getting it done, and refuses to play the guy who is actually more productive. Add in the fact that he's more invested in Sanders and keeping up appearances, everyone else is just a glorified afterthought at most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Reich is guilty of the same thing Rivera was: He has some preconceived notion about seniority when a guy isn't getting it done, and refuses to play the guy who is actually more productive. Add in the fact that he's more invested in Sanders and keeping up appearances, everyone else is just a glorified afterthought at most. 

Is this the case at QB as well?  Projection aside, as of now, Dalton is our best QB and it ain't even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Mostly the same Oline”…. Seeing that a lot lately… did y’all not see 62 getting his poo pushed in? Nearly sacked Darnold a couple times himself by getting bulldozed backwards into him. 
 

There’s only 5 linemen guys… 1-2 of those guys being out or not 100% can change the dynamic of the team instantly and it showed today.


Fitt assuming we were good staying pat with what we had last year at oline and not providing quality depth is about as bad of a choice as trading away our WR1 and a 1st for BY. Fitt’s ass and the team’s success or lack there of displays it.

Edited by Fright
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Is this the case at QB as well?  Projection aside, as of now, Dalton is our best QB and it ain't even close.

I can't say that. He got a pretty middling defense. And he's a seasoned pro, supposedly one of the better backups in the league. You could probably put Dalton on the Texans or Colts and they might be undefeated right now. You also have to take coaching and context into account.

In my opinion, Bryce's growth and experience means way more towards the long-term progress of our franchise than useless losses by Dalton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • OL should be taken in the first three rounds at least every other draft. thank you for coming to my ted talk 
    • Wide receivers, even the great ones (and they are rare) can get real expensive, real quick and are involved in say 40-70% of a team's plays, based on that team's particular style of offense. An edge rusher, DT or LB can very often be involved in 100% of the plays on defense.  It's a much better, more cost effective pick to grab one of those defenders (who are easier to evaluate and plug into a system) than to spin out yet another pick on a wide receiver. We're fair to middling, maybe even good with receivers right now. And ignoring a need in a draft might just be the dumbest way to work a draft. Really, just think about what you said.
    • We almost won with basically JAGs on defense without Brown and you guys are dooming? If DB plays we win that game, no doubt in my mind.  We have more picks to make this year and it will be nice to spend at least 5 or 6 of them on defense. I would like at least one OL.
×
×
  • Create New...