Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marty Hurney, Dave Gettleman, Scott Fitterer


Sean Payton's Vicodin
 Share

The best of the worst!  

88 members have voted

  1. 1. Who was the BEST?

    • Marty Hurney
      52
    • David Gettleman
      19
    • Scott Fitterer
      17
  2. 2. Who was the WORST?

    • Marty Hurney
      23
    • David Gettleman
      37
    • Scott Fitterer
      28


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Yeah, I'm not willing to die for Scott Fitterer.

To quote Achmed the Dead Terrorist, I'd kill you for a Klondike bar.

Thing is though, I'm just not a "hot take" guy. I've watched out football seasons to know that what you think you know early on often proves very very wrong.

That's why I'm cautious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney was the most successful. Gettleman won with Hurney's players and was a stubborn bastard.

I think Fitterer does the best "day to day" job out of the 3. It's just that he worked with a coach that sucked. But he's the only one that seems to aggressively attack the needs of the team, get's the guys his coaches want, and drafts for need AND BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Natural said:

2003, 2005 and 2008 were all SB caliber teams. Not saying Hurney was a great GM overall but you are really glossing over the fact he was the architect behind a very solid run in the mid- 2000's. You could also make the argument that the 2015 team was a Hurney product given the vast majority of star players were brought in by him.

If only he and Fox didn't have such a hard on for Delhomme and drafted a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Indeed. That's what we're working with. That's the sample size. We all hope it'll get better but we all hoped it would get better going into week two as well. 

It was this same story throughout the preseason. It would be different come the regular season. Okay, so when? Not week one. Not week two.  When can a reasonable fan expect to see signs of a functional padding offense?

Functional? Maybe after the bye. 

But this offense isn't going to be respectable with Frank Reich calling plays and this skill talent in 2023.  Frank is what he is and the skill talent is what it is.  Pending their isn't some miracle where someone tranforms quickly like a Mingo or TMJ into a vastly different player.  But the rest is what it is.  Hurst, Theilen, Chark, etc all are what they are.  And there just aren't good odds that Mingo or TMJ can make massive enough jumps to really alter things. 

but I always thought pre bye it was going to be really rough.  Hope would for Bryce over coming some of it and growing down the stretch.  But that doesn't mean wins.  or even good offense.  Just good individual play in a meh spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all the downing of hurney’s 2nd day picks (and they were bad), Fitterer has not been any better. TMJ is on par with Dwayne Jarrett, Corral is pickles or armanti Edwards. It’s just been nothing but a wasteland for Fitterer without the corresponding first round success that Hurney had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fitt is slightly hitting more than missing at FA but draft is a different story...

I don't like to compare drafts after the fact because it's all a crapshoot, but the Mingo pick and then aggressive trade up for DJJ (who's been inactive) is just not looking like the best strategy given the holes. 

I would have loved to target a trade down from 39  (I.E. PIT had 48 and 80) given who was available, but no doubt, that needs a willing trade partner.   

I just hate to see some draft crushes killing it right now.  Tuli is crushing it for the Chargers, Torrence in BUF, Mims in Denver, Spears has looked great for TEN, Byron Young in LA.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hepcat said:

Best is Hurney, 2nd is Gettleman, 3rd is Fitterer. Hurney drafted most of the panthers legends of the last 20 years. 

Not you specifically, yours was just the first one to make me want to respond.

I don't know if this is a Panthers thing, or not, but this weird obsession with "drafting star players" and absolutely caring more about the players than winning seasons is very strange to me.

Marty gave us a BUNCH of names to cheer on, and a BUNCH of losing seasons.  I'd rather not know a single player on the roster and win, than have TD, Luke, Olsen, Cam, CMC, Norman, Smith and Peppers out there losing season after season.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add, as I got a bit distracted.  One of my closest friends in the world and I had this discussion at the last game we attended together.

We were talking about winning and what was going on with the Panthers.  I said that I wanted Marty run out of town on rails, and she was aghast.  "He's drafted all of my favorite players" was her rationale.

I asked her if she would rather win, or have her favorite players on the roster.....she wanted the players more than the W.

Very strange to me, but whatever.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney was gold on 1st pick as everyone agrees...but when you pick top 10...a chimp could hit
that....
Gettledouch had some good stuff but handling of Norman and Smitty was terrible...led to 3 outta first 4 picks on DBs.
Fitt is supposedly known for digging out great talent in mid late rounds of draft but not really
seeing that come to fruition....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also look at Hurney from a different cutoff point than others. Everyone compares the first and the second stint, but to me the tale of two Hurneys were the before and after the '08 draft

Before that draft, I would classify Hurney as a solid to good GM. He was putting together some solid teams that were unfortunately getting derailed by significant injuries. Then he traded for Jeff Otah and the wheels just fell off.

He extended Delhomme after his playoff implosion and then we got Tommy Jone Delhomme there after. '09 was probably the worst draft in the history of the franchise, especially when you consider we traded a future first to move up in the 2nd to take everette brown. '10 was also horrible because we didn't have a first for the second year in a row, then we ended up taking pickles and trading a future 2nd to move up in the 3rd for armanti edwards.

After assembling the team with the worst record in the league, he went on a spending spree and extended half of that 2 win team to bad contracts and investing WAY too much money into the RB position while the rest of the league was doing the opposite. We then drafted Cam which was a fantastic pick, but literally every other pick in that draft completely sucked. 

'12 was probably the best draft Hurney had in years but he had already crapped the bed so many times over 4 years it was time to move on.

We brought him back and it was like nothing changed. Giving a RB a record breaking deal, overpaying for mid players and sucking at drafting in every round but the first. 

Hurney from 02 to 08 - Good GM. Hurney from 09-20 with a break in the middle, bad GM; and The bad was significantly worse than the good

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

I don't know if this is a Panthers thing, or not, but this weird obsession with "drafting star players" and absolutely caring more about the players than winning seasons is very strange to me.

Marty gave us a BUNCH of names to cheer on, and a BUNCH of losing seasons.  I'd rather not know a single player on the roster and win, than have TD, Luke, Olsen, Cam, CMC, Norman, Smith and Peppers out there losing season after season.

Pretty much.

57 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

To add, as I got a bit distracted.  One of my closest friends in the world and I had this discussion at the last game we attended together.

We were talking about winning and what was going on with the Panthers.  I said that I wanted Marty run out of town on rails, and she was aghast.  "He's drafted all of my favorite players" was her rationale.

I asked her if she would rather win, or have her favorite players on the roster.....she wanted the players more than the W.

Very strange to me, but whatever.

We've seen almost this exact take more than once in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...