Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young performance graph #2


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, I stopped getting upset about Panthers failures long ago.

Eh, was using "you" in the general sense. The only full football games I've watched in a few years now are college games. I can enjoy them for what they are. The Panthers beat hope out of me a long time ago. I tune in for a while, watch the team look like poo as always, and change the channel.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It was the right call but yeah, it was lucky. It has nothing to do with his sack and fumble.

Bryce isn't throwing the ball down field much because it isn't working out well for him. Simple as that.

Yup. Simple as that, you figured it out! Surely it wouldn’t have anything to do with Frank only calling a pass on 3rd and long.

It couldn’t be on the pathetic group of receivers that quit on their routes, never get depth, and prevent Bryce from throwing with any kind of anticipation because he has no clue how they’re going to screw up their route on a given play.

Couldn’t be the pocket breaking down from the interior in 1.5 seconds. You absolute certified genius you figured it out and it’s so simple. He just sucks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

Yup. Simple as that, you figured it out! Surely it wouldn’t have anything to do with Frank only calling a pass on 3rd and long.

It couldn’t be on the pathetic group of receivers that quit on their routes, never get depth, and prevent Bryce from throwing with any kind of anticipation because he has no clue how they’re going to screw up their route on a given play.

Couldn’t be the pocket breaking down from the interior in 1.5 seconds. You absolute certified genius you figured it out and it’s so simple. He just sucks!

Now if Bryce committed to UNC, this board would be much more patient

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Bryce allegedly have a bad o-line and mediocre receivers his last year at Alabama? Maybe Frank should go back to the Alabama footage and see if we can mimic what they did that season to be successful. Maybe a matter of adapting to Bryce's game...

...something like that. Hell, we're all trying to figure it out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, frankw said:

You guys remind me of Sam Darnold stans.

That's not a good thing.

It’s funny, u can tell who absolutely does not know ball by their Bryce takes. We are talking about a guy in his second start playing against an elite NFL defense. With a terrible offense around him. It does not require mental gymnastics to understand why he wouldn’t play a great game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

It’s funny, u can tell who absolutely does not know ball by their Bryce takes. We are talking about a guy in his second start playing against an elite NFL defense. With a terrible offense around him. It does not require mental gymnastics to understand why he wouldn’t play a great game. 

My guy I've seen countless either mediocre or flat out awful QB's with my own eyes playing for this team. The offensive issues are not on one player and so far our head coach looks clueless but Bryce Young needs to play much better football too. I'm sorry you're too delicate to discuss that but we acknowledge reality here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...