Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce DNP in practice 9-20-23

Samppson

By Samppson,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

Regardless if this is a smokescreen to protect BY or the real deal, an injury this early in an NFL qb's  career whose biggest knock predraft was that he may be too small ( ie injury prone) to play in the NFL, itdoesn't give me a lot of confidence in this team, be it the front office, coaching staff, or players going forward.

LOL Anthony Richardson is a tank and hes gotten injured in both is games so far.  Stroud got hurt too.  Its the NFL, guys get injured all the time, regardless of how big they are.  His size has absolutely nothing to do with his ankle getting rolled while being tackled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, joemac said:

LOL Anthony Richardson is a tank and hes gotten injured in both is games so far.  Stroud got hurt too.  Its the NFL, guys get injured all the time, regardless of how big they are.  His size has absolutely nothing to do with his ankle getting rolled while being tackled.

So size doesn't matter?  Got ya ..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stratocatter said:

Maybe they had a WR revolt and want some deep targets.
Which Frank wont call with his baby in the game yet.

Because he doesn’t think the OL will protect him on longer developing routes? Okay I know that is a stretch but I am suspicious of the reasons we shorten/compress the field in the passing game.
Dalton, come one down. 

all you got to do is turn on the film of them not being able to separate to quiet them down. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
Posted
On 9/20/2023 at 10:28 AM, toldozer said:

Where the hell do you think he's going to go? Oakland?

Well in fairness, it would make sense that a team with a black panther mascot would be based in the city that birthed the black panthers. Problem is the city won’t pay for the infrastructure portion so no professional sports team will touch it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stratocatter Mentor

stratocatter

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Well in fairness, it would make sense that a team with a black panther mascot would be based in the city that birthed the black panthers. Problem is the city won’t pay for the infrastructure portion so no professional sports team will touch it.

That is a marketing win right there. The Oakland Panthers.  In that city.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...