Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce DNP in practice 9-20-23


Samppson
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Everyone kept telling us his size didnt matter. It only took 2 games for him to end up
 on the injury report.

This is such a stupid take and falls flat when Anthony Richardson is also tracking to not play this week and was also hurt week 1 and missed a few snaps.

 
Bash his play all you want, that's fair game - but the size bro argument is just dumb.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

This is such a stupid take and falls flat when Anthony Richardson is also tracking to not play this week and was also hurt week 1 and missed a few snaps.

 
Bash his play all you want, that's fair game - but the size bro argument is just dumb.

The size concern is much less of a factor than his physical traits. Other prospects like Stroud have the arm talent to make downfield throws into tight windows. Young refused to throw at the combine and his deep throws at his pro day were not pretty. Yes our WR's are not doing well and the playcalling is poor. But expecting Bryce Young to make this a dynamic offense was a tall order. It was always going to be dink and dunk with a heavy run game.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, frankw said:

The size concern is much less of a factor than his physical traits. Other prospects like Stroud have the arm talent to make downfield throws into tight windows. Young refused to throw at the combine and his deep throws at his pro day were not pretty. Yes our WR's are not doing well and the playcalling is poor. But expecting Bryce Young to make this a dynamic offense was a tall order. It was always going to be dink and dunk with a heavy run game.

I really do not understand where this comes from.  Bryce has show the ability in college and in the pros (when given the chance) to zip and fit tight window throws into the intermediate level (20-25 yards).  Just watch the QB school from last week on him.  He doesn't look like he has any less arm strength than anybody else.  Carr didn't seem to have a stronger arm than Bryce.  And on the 2 or 3 deep shots we've attempted in 2 weeks, Bryce has overthrown the guy all 3 times.  He routinely dropped deep ball dimes in college when he had a guy like Jameson Williams streaking down the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they had a WR revolt and want some deep targets.
Which Frank wont call with his baby in the game yet.

Because he doesn’t think the OL will protect him on longer developing routes? Okay I know that is a stretch but I am suspicious of the reasons we shorten/compress the field in the passing game.
Dalton, come one down. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, joemac said:

I really do not understand where this comes from.  Bryce has show the ability in college and in the pros (when given the chance) to zip and fit tight window throws into the intermediate level (20-25 yards).  Just watch the QB school from last week on him.  He doesn't look like he has any less arm strength than anybody else.  Carr didn't seem to have a stronger arm than Bryce.  And on the 2 or 3 deep shots we've attempted in 2 weeks, Bryce has overthrown the guy all 3 times.  He routinely dropped deep ball dimes in college when he had a guy like Jameson Williams streaking down the field.

He had jameson Williams 2 years ago, last year it wasn't the same. Last year he couldnt hit guys in stride, all his deep passes were flat or had no velocity,  receivers had to slow down or stop on routes to catch them....he even threw some flat out ducks.  I pointed this out during the draft process but of course most people are only gonna pay attention to the result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless if this is a smokescreen to protect BY or the real deal, an injury this early in an NFL qb's  career whose biggest knock predraft was that he may be too small ( ie injury prone) to play in the NFL, itdoesn't give me a lot of confidence in this team, be it the front office, coaching staff, or players going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...