Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce DNP in practice 9-20-23


Samppson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Sgt Schultz said:

That is probably the truest thing posted today.

Yep. As quick as I can lose interest in watching this team, I've lost interest in sticking around here much quicker. But hey if Bryce doesn't play, I guess that means it's gonna be a blowout W, since he -- not the scheme, coaches, OL, WRs, defense -- is the problem holding this clown car back.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 33inNC said:

What a waste of a pick, especially trading all we did. Dude is too small to be a franchise QB and won't be durable enough. 

Some of us were saying this pre-draft.  People can say what they want, but after only 2 games it’s apparent this kid is lost and overwhelmed.  Even the look on his dads face Sunday was telling. He’s way too small and weak armed for the NFL. Our brain trust outsmarted themselves once again.  I miss Richardson, Rivera, Wilks and more. At least we knew we had a chance to be average. Since Tepper we are way below average and there is no reason to believe that is going to change. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dalton does play this week, it'll at least give us an idea of how much of the offensive woes fall on Bryce.  Similar to last season when people blamed Baker's batted passes mostly on the predictable playcalling but lo and behold, when PJ and eventually Sam stepped in at starting QB after Baker left, all of a sudden no more batted passes.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...