Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One thing we know for sure now...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

One thing we know for sure now, after the win against the Vikings, is that we could be a legitimate contender with good QB play. 99.9% of our problems this year have been caused by Jake's performance. It's rare that you can lay almost all the blame on one player, but this is one of those rare occasions. We have a good enough team that we don't need the QB to win it for us, we need a game manager.

I know I'm gonna catch hell for this, but this makes me consider giving Fox/Hurney one more season to get this thing turned around. Sunday night demonstrated that we are a QB away from being a very good team and this is the house that Fox/Hurney built. You can blame Fox for not pulling the plug on Jake sooner, that's fair, but you have to consider the politics of that decision - it's not just a football decision. Right now, the Titans have climbed back to .500 with Vince Young and Jeff Fisher is off the hot seat, but remember that Bud Adams insisted Fisher start Young when they were 0-6. If I was Mr. Richardson, after watching Sunday night's game I would be very tempted to let Fox finish out the final year of his contract, but I would also keep him on a short leash and monitor our QB situation very closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing we know for sure now, after the win against the Vikings, is that we could be a legitimate contender with good QB play. 99.9% of our problems this year have been caused by Jake's performance. It's rare that you can lay almost all the blame on one player, but this is one of those rare occasions. We have a good enough team that we don't need the QB to win it for us, we need a game manager. .

Balls mishandled/tipped by our own receivers or they run wrong routes. Balls kicked to defenders. 10 of 18 ints came while under pressure. Defense that at one point was giving up rushing yardage at 4.8 ypc average. We've improved that to 4.6 making a whole 3 teams in the league worse. 99.9% on Jake. We can certainly fix all that and be Superbowl bound in 2010 by starting Matt "BY GOD" Moore.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game manager is code for an average QB with a great team around with..why settle for an average QB that can't lead us down the field in the 4th?

because it beats the pants off of a starting a quarterback who single handedly loses the game in the first quarter for us?

@sultan

our defense has been good all year long, especially if u take away the bad field position and points jake let up due to picks. even with the injuries we've taken, we would be at LEAST 9-7 this year if jake didn't play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@sultan

our defense has been good all year long, especially if u take away the bad field position and points jake let up due to picks. even with the injuries we've taken, we would be at LEAST 9-7 this year if jake didn't play.

You cant take away bad field position and points jake gave us. That is part of the game and that is what I was talking about in my original post. I guess my expectations are high with my team. Ive seen blown coverages and Ive seen us gashed by Rbs at the line of scrimmage. unless you can stop the run you arent a great defense. We have improved and I was very impressed with our defense against the vikings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game manager is code for an average QB with a great team around with..why settle for an average QB that can't lead us down the field in the 4th?

Hey, if we can get the next Peyton Manning I'm all for that - but we don't need to find the next Peyton Manning to win, we just need a guy that's not a liability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you cant plug all your holes in any season. if every team waited until they were perfect at every position they would never have superbowl. every team has flaws the good ones minimize them. the bad ones let them take them down.

Agreed, but the problem is that flaws at particular positions on a football team are more difficult to overcome.

There are very few teams that can compensate for bad QB play. All we needed for the QB position this season was to not make the big mistakes. Problem is, Jake was turning the ball over way too many times. We never needed him to carry this team....just to not hurt it.

If we would have brought in Hollis Thomas earlier and cut down on the interceptions, the Panthers would be right in the Wildcard hunt this season....this I have no doubts about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Current draft order NYG, NE, JAX, TN, CLE, LV, CAR. We need to ask ourselves "what is the biggest need of those teams heading into the draft"? And, "What positions do we know are not major needs for the teams above?" JAX is terrible, but we know they won't be drafting a QB. The Patriots won't be either. The Raiders and Giants definitely need a QB. The Browns have one under contract, but he's been terrible since they signed him. I could see all 3 of them eyeing QB's. Hunter is a wild card. He could be the first player taken. Or, he could slip because some teams may not want to deal with his insistence on playing both ways. A team with a bad O-line may want to go LT TMAC is going to appeal to a team that needs a playmaker at WR. If CB is major need, I could see Will Thomas (or Hunter) coming off the board prior to our selection at #7. It's possible that Graham could fall into our laps. Then again we haven't factored FA into the equation. A lot of these teams will lure some players just because of the large amount of dollars they afford to play them and fix some needs before the draft. It's going to be an interesting off-season.   
    • Sure, but despite being targeted less, he has more TDs than Odunze and more y/r than Nabers (and same number of TDs).  He's got a very similar y/r as Worthy.  He isn't stacking up that poorly to other WRs, but he has trailed off late - something that imo may indicate injury or needing to improve conditioning. He's not ever gonna be the best WR in this draft class, but he'll be in the top 3-5 with a bit of improvement imo.
    • Oh for sure. With Rod it’s never the defenses fault. I think someone posted this in Reddit a while back. Rod with the forwards. Rod with the defense.  
×
×
  • Create New...