Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce has the fewest open windows in the league, is the most accurate throwing with an open window


Cary Kollins
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’ll never root for our guys to fail. But not being sold on him and rooting to fail aren’t the same thing. I mean I guess I could just not be critical and only post when I’m impressed?

You could stfu about a rookie that’s played his 2nd game with the most overhauled offensive roster in the NFL. 

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You could stfu about a rookie that’s played his 2nd game with the most overhauled offensive roster in the NFL. 

If you're this angry defending an 0-2 Panthers team with a bottom 3 offense maybe it's time to unplug for awhile my guy.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You could stfu about a rookie that’s played his 2nd game with the most overhauled offensive roster in the NFL. 

Are you drinking this morning? Or is something going on in your life away from the huddle? Not sure what’s up with all the hostility. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

They really need to get something going in the running game to pull off some play action. All this vanilla shotgun stuff is going nowhere. Clock/timeout management was a joke last night as well. Killed our own momentum

Hard to do that when the offense is constantly facing sdefenses that are stacked up in the box. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are plays to be made out there, everybody is not covered.

He needs to get the backs more involved in the passing game.

Go back at look at the last scoring drive his top receiver was Hubbard. 

The play below resulted in an incompletion. The Saints defense didn't even bother defending Hubbard. 

 

Screenshot_20230920_083220_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230920_083121_Chrome.jpg

Edited by Pantherxtreme
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

There are plays to be made out there, everybody is not covered.

He needs to get the backs more involved in the passing game.

Go back at look at the last scoring drive his top receiver was Hubbard. 

The play below resulted in an incompletion. The Saints defense didn't even bother defending Hubbard. 

 

Screenshot_20230920_083220_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230920_083121_Chrome.jpg

Prevent defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

There are plays to be made out there, everybody is not covered.

He needs to get the backs more involved in the passing game.

Go back at look at the last scoring drive his top receiver was Hubbard. 

The play below resulted in an incompletion. The Saints defense didn't even bother defending Hubbard. 

 

Screenshot_20230920_083220_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230920_083121_Chrome.jpg

No one has, since half way through his rookie season when he had the dropsies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair, most of us who've seen Hubbard on pass plays would likely understand that decision 😕

I think Hubbard's improved in that area. 

But for whatever reason the Saints were leaving the flats open all game. The drive that we emphasized the flats is the drive we scored on. 

He seems to be struggling to get the ball in the tight windows, make the defense account for the whole field and there will be holes in the zone. 

Brady made a killing with this. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...