Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A loss to the Saints on MNF would be as bad a start as the Panthers can get.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Yeah, keep on with the “rebuild” 

signed,

2-0 Desmond Ritter

2-0 Mayfield

2-0 garbage ass David carr 

For real the Bucs lost the GOAT and all the players he brought in and they are 2-0

Panthers are in perma rebuild mode I guess bc they are just gonna cycle through coaches like Netflix does with their shows.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tepper is the problem. These HC's we hire are his decision.

 

Not sure why he thought is was a good idea to hire a HC who was fired. The excuses has to stop. We blaming everybody but Tepper.

 

 

Starting to look that way. Every time I read a report that “Tepper was blown away by *inser name*”, it’s starting to worry me. Granted, it’s so early in Reichs and youngs career here, but him being blown away by Rhule and Hurney, is worrisome. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Starting to look that way. Every time I read a report that “Tepper was blown away by *inser name*”, it’s starting to worry me. Granted, it’s so early in Reichs and youngs career here, but him being blown away by Rhule and Hurney, is worrisome. 

Tepper didn't pick Reich. Fitterer and Morgan did.

Tepper originally wanted Ben Johnson, then one of the other younger guys after he backed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Brand new staff, new schemes on both offense and defense (necessitating roster turnover) and a rookie quarterback...

That'd be a yes.

They switched schemes mid season last year on both sides of the ball and improved, a full offseason with this all star constructed staff shouldn't be having the type of problems that make it acceptable to call it a "rebuild"

If they felt the staff turnover was going to cause that many issues, THEN YOU DON'T TRADE AWAY THE FARM FOR A QB WITH SERIOUS LONGEVITY CONCERNS THE YEAR BEFORE A STACKED QB DRAFT!!!!!

That's what I can't get past with people calling this year a rebuild.  If you really felt it was going to be like that this year, then you keep your picks, sign a journeyman QB, take your lumps while the rest of the team learns the new schemes, and draft your QB with your own pick next year.

THAT is how you do a rebuild, not get the QB first.  What we did is basically the equivalent of Groot stealing that battery in the jail of the first Guardians of the Galaxy movie.  It was supposed to be the last piece to the puzzle, but instead did it first in a stupid way and then needed to scramble to figure the rest out.

I'm still not saying I think the sky is falling on this season after 1 week, plenty of time to turn it around, but it's why I can't stand people saying this year should be viewed in the sense of a rebuild.

But if Bryce doesn't end up a HOF caliber QB and we give a Top 10 pick to the Bears next year, that trade will forever be looked at as the worst transaction in franchise history.  I'm sorry, but it's just a fact.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...