Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HEAVENS TO BETSY, LOOK AT THESE WIDE-OPEN RECEIVERS

Carl Spackler

By Carl Spackler,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

DeAngelo Beason Proficient

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Thanks man! I'd be remiss if I didn't point out the ridiculousness of your Jimmy Clausen comparison.

Granted, Clausen needed three games to throw his first touchdown pass, by which point he'd amassed four turnovers, while Bryce waited a much longer four possessions to throw his. Plus, there's an endless array of differences beyond that. But to your credit, you stated reality in the face and said "Nope, not today."

Wellp, he played like ass.  Looked like ass.  Looked like one of the worst rookie performances we've ever had.  Sorry, but that's reality.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 9/10/2023 at 7:48 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Those route concepts are pretty awful. A lot easier to cover when all the receivers are roughly at the same depth of the field.

Like seriously. Everybody is covered once the Atlanta D adjust… to a simple zone scheme. 
 

I want our OC calling plays next Sunday.

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

We were running an offense that really would have swung well with both CMC and DJ Moore on the field. 

But those days are gone.

Let's give it a bit more time. I'm sure the coaches are seeing the same things from the tape that we are. Surely they will adjust.

 

They are seeing that they should have kept CMC and DJ and traded Burns instead.  Fitterer is a moron.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Yes, it is.

No, it is not.

  • Kerry Collins 1995 vs New York Jets: 14-26, 158 yards, 2 INT, 40.2 rating
  • Kerry Collins 1995 vs San Francisco: 12-29, 127 yards, INT, 40.4 rating
  • Chris Weinke 2001 vs New England: 15-36, 144 yards, 3 INT, 18.8 rating
  • Chris Weinke 2001 vs New York Jets: 12-34, 76 yards, INT, 31.7 rating
  • Chris Weinke 2001 vs Atlanta: 17-31, 171 yards, 2 INT, 43.9 rating
  • Randy Fasani 2002 at Atlanta: 6-18, 100 yards, INT, 29.9 rating
  • Randy Fasani 2002 vs Tampa Bay: 5-18, 46 yards, 3 INT, 0.0 rating
  • Jimmy Clausen 2010 vs New Orleans: 8-18, 47 yards, INT, 28.5 rating
  • Jimmy Clausen 2010 vs Chicago: 9-22, 61 yards, INT, 29.7 rating
  • Jimmy Clausen 2010 at Pittsburgh: 10-23, 72 yards, INT, 33.2 rating
  • Jimmy Clausen 2010 vs Tampa Bay: 7-13, 59 yards, INT, 33.8 rating
  • Cam Newton 2011 at Atlanta: 237 yards, 3 INT, 44.6 rating
  • Will Grier 2019 at Indy: 27-44, 224 yards, 3 INT, 46 rating
  • Will Grier 2019 vs New Orleans: 1-8, 4 yards, INT, 0.0 rating

Hy-per-bo-le.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BullCityP
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By BullCityP · Posted

      Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • tukafan21
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • BullCityP
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By BullCityP · Posted

      Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...