Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots releasing Corral


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

They have to pay him after turning down " The Trade" 

I just dont consider it a "win". That went out the window when we decided a pass rush specialist that is a huge liability in stopping the run was worth more than The Trade

 

The only way "the trade" would have went down is if David Tepper truly is a bottom tier owner and didn't give a poo about winning. If he approves that trade not only is Fitterer gone within the next season our stadium that so many people complain about being filled with opposing fans is going to be a home away from home for every other team for minimum 2 years. Who is going to pay to watch that when we signal we don't give a fug about winning and wave the white flag while we wait for future picks that aren't even guaranteed top ten?

You can acknowledge Fitterer is not living up to the job but also be realistic that trade would have done nothing to save our current roster. In actuality if we dumped Burns we should have dumped Brown and Chinn as well. Then went all in on the offense. That would be the only way to justify it.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, frankw said:

The only way "the trade" would have went down is if David Tepper truly is a bottom tier owner and didn't give a poo about winning. If he approves that trade not only is Fitterer gone within the next season our stadium that so many people complain about being filled with opposing fans is going to be a home away from home for every other team for minimum 2 years. Who is going to pay to watch that when we signal we don't give a fug about winning and wave the white flag while we wait for future picks that aren't even guaranteed top ten?

You can acknowledge Fitterer is not living up to the job but also be realistic that trade would have done nothing to save our current roster. In actuality if we dumped Burns we should have dumped Brown and Chinn as well. Then went all in on the offense. That would be the only way to justify it.

All because of Burns? I just dont see it. He is not that great bro. We were fuging losing anyway. 

This fanbase watched JP, a future HOF, walk for nothing. I am sure we could have gotten over losing a fringe pro bowler. 

Burns is quickly becoming the edge version of Shaq Thompson. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

So...do the folks that claimed that Billythecheat is way too clever for us still believe that drivel? Don't worry, nobody was paying attention anyway. 

 

If Corral winds up on our PS, does that make us smarter than the average bear?

Seriously. All these hypocrites calling Fitterer a dumb dumb for cutting Corral 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

All because of Burns? I just dont see it. He is not that great bro. We were fuging losing anyway. 

This fanbase watched JP, a future HOF, walk for nothing. I am sure we could have gotten over losing a fringe pro bowler. 

It's not just about Burns. I guess we are on different wavelengths in this convo. No problem agree to disagree.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

It's not just about Burns. I guess we are on different wavelengths in this convo. No problem agree to disagree.

Thats cool, my original post was about Fitt being shown the door with Rhule and co. and I still believe that. He is the weak link of our front office imo. 

He might doom Reichs time here with his bad drafting and we will need to rid ourselves of both of them, but will probably just fire Fitt and get a new GM.

I dont want to go into a cycle of new coach, new gm every other year. They should have been hired in the same cycle, Fitt had done nothing to make keeping him a great move and nobody would have had a problem with letting him go. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

So...do the folks that claimed that Billythecheat is way too clever for us still believe that drivel? Don't worry, nobody was paying attention anyway. 

 

If Corral winds up on our PS, does that make us smarter than the average bear?

Considering we traded a third and a fourth for a guy who can barely make the practice squad, I'd say no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@mrcompletely11@Gerry Green

Dammit y'all stop this pissing contest.

I see anything more of it and y'all will be gone for good. Be grateful I'm not banning either one of you right now. First game of the year so I'm free generous, but I won't guarantee I'll stay like this.

If anyone else sees them doing this crap, report it and I'll make sure we don't have any more threads fugged up because of this poo.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
    • Walker is a good player and comes from a great defensive minded school but there a questions about him. He could be a superstar or bust.  You trade down and will get a player with similar concerns and you jump into the middle of the second round where there are some good players.  YOU'RE not getting a 1st next year and a 2nd for 8. These mock simulators give you fair value for the most part. I've tried and most counter offers were rejected.  We trade down get a good first round graded player and jump into the middle of 2nd round and not having to wait for 57.  Plus if a stud falls to the late first or early 2nd round we could package 46 and 57 and get him. 
    • It's just a burden to throw a dart if you're so green. Dan has his work cut out for him.
×
×
  • Create New...