Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots releasing Corral


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

2 weeks ago when the Pats picked up Corral a lot of you used that against Fitt. Now that the Pats have waived Corral, a lot of you are holding that against Fitt. Just shows that consistency is not a big Huddle trait. And if you want to disparage someone, spin is more important than facts. 

 

Damm, this interwebz thingy is more fun than a barrel of monkeys. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

2 weeks ago when the Pats picked up Corral a lot of you used that against Fitt. Now that the Pats have waived Corral, a lot of you are holding that against Fitt. Just shows that consistency is not a big Huddle trait. And if you want to disparage someone, spin is more important than facts. 

 

Damm, this interwebz thingy is more fun than a barrel of monkeys. 

 

for someone who hates this place you sure are here a lot

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

for someone who hates this place you sure are here a lot

 

I'm not sure you have the reading part down. But I am sure you need help with the comprehension part.

 

Cuz I LOVE this place. Just reading through the threads puts a big smile on my face. And I have you to thank for most of it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB is a tough position to evaluate for scouts. I’m glad my job doesn’t depend on it. Corral’s accuracy looked terrible last game, but in college it was his strength. It’s mind boggling, but I think we have a good one now in Young so hopefully this whole Corral thing will become water under the bridge. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

QB is a tough position to evaluate for scouts. I’m glad my job doesn’t depend on it. Corral’s accuracy looked terrible last game, but in college it was his strength. It’s mind boggling, but I think we have a good one now in Young so hopefully this whole Corral thing will become water under the bridge. 

 

Can you think of the last running team that did anything? Titans, but they had Tannyhill. Ridder ain't no Tannyhill. 

 

Balance wins. If things go according to plan. That will be our bread and butter. Load the box, we pass it. Don't load the box, and we run it. Easy peasy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Woof what a pick that turned out to be. Fitterer needs a win. Get that Burns deal today.

Surely overpaying Burns is a win right? lol.

Fitt should have been shown the door with Rhule and co. He has done next to nothing since he has been here, no better than Hurney at drafting after the 1st round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Surely overpaying Burns is a win right? lol.

Fitt should have been shown the door with Rhule and co. He has done next to nothing since he has been here, no better than Hurney at drafting after the 1st round. 

You'd rather let him walk or get much lower value for him in a trade?

No argument about Fitterer he has been given pass after pass here because of Matt Rhule and in truth mainly because he preceded Hurney. The Seahawks have not only been doing fine without him they are actually significantly better and that’s with Geno Smith lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 1) Signed 2 high profile guards to big contracts. Did we need guards? Yes. But there's a reason you draft guards and pay tackles. It's easier to find solid guards in the draft. Now we have the most expensive line in the league and still can't get 100 yards passing before halftime.  2) Traded up to get a RB when we didn't really need one. Chuba is one of the better RBs in the league right now and while it is a contract year, we had a crap ton of holes all over. Brooks was a luxury pick we didn't have the luxury to make. 3)Spending a small fortune to build a supporting cast for BY. Bryce didn't even put the work in himself during the offseason by his own admission. We didn't need to build an offense specifically for BY. We brought in DJ and drafted XL. These guys need a QB with a live arm. That's not BY. Speed kills but not when your QB can't legitimately make an accurate, deep ball strike without putting a ton of air under it and floating it.  4. Not looking for a true center. There were several available and it's been a position of need for years. We could have had our choice but we rolled with Corbitt, who did look good at the spot, but had an injury bug that struck again this year.  5) He didn't bring in any serious competition for Bryce. Now you can say that BY needs time to develop and we needed to show we had faith in him, blah blah blah. But the simple matter of fact is Bryce looked like a PS QB last year, Andy has one foot in the QB grave, and there was never an attempt to actually compete for the job. If he genuinely believed that BY was going to magically make it all come together watching YT and chillin for 4 months to unplug, then there's nothing else that needs to be said.  The goal of every GM should be to build a winning team. Players are commodities and loyalty leads you to an early walk out the door. We've tried to build a system to work around the most limited QB in NFL history. 60 years of history should have told him it was never going to work. And benching BY after 2 games is the real truth, he never should have been starting anyway. And either Dan should have known that as the great MLB that he was after watching BY's game tape, or someone else is making the call and Dan is just rubberstamping that decision.  Either way, doesn't matter. We're screwed because we've devoted 2 years of resources to build around a player that didn't put in the work in the off season after one of the worst NFL QB seasons ever. 
    • Something I find interesting is that you are more likely to find successful players as UDFA's than you are to find them with a single pick in any round past 3.  Those 3rd round compensatory choices?  Largely worthless.  Yes, I get it, there are a lot more UDFA's than there are drafted players in later rounds.  Basically, if you're fishing for starters you are simply not going to find anything in Rounds 4 - 7 with any regularity.
    • the argument that Dan Morgan was assistant GM for years while running counter to everything both his bosses signed off on (who look down at him and his staff for info).....is a tough sell.  I feel we do a variant of this every year.  You aren't this bad...becuase of 1 person.  You are this bad because of LOTS of bad people.  It was never just Joe Brady.  Which is why firing him didn't lead to better offense.  It was never just Matt Rhule.  It was never just Fitterer.    As bad as we are, we need to scorch Earth this puppy and quit letting people who were part of making the mess be the designed folks to lead us out of the mess.  when David Tepper and Jim Caldwell found the answer on the roster......it was clear from the jump nothing had really changed.   
×
×
  • Create New...